Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

VALLE DI GRANADA

IMO: 9292278
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 13,827 t
Port of registry: Trieste
Technical efficiency: EIV 7.80 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Navigazione Montanari SpA

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,827 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

124.0 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 129.0 kg/nm (−4%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

28.46

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.06 (+253%)

Average speed

11.7 kn

Oil tanker median 10.9 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

34.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,224 t

CO₂ emitted

10,229 t

10,387 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

25,992 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,228 h

93 days, 25% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,787 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 124.0 kg/nm · median 129.0 (−4%)

79.5Ranks 795 of 1,787, lowest first193.6

Average speedThis ship 11.7 kn · median 10.9 (+7%)

8.1Faster than 74% of oil tanker ships12.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 28.46 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.06 (+253%)

4.44Ranks 1,642 of 1,787, lowest first25.70

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports54%
From the EU8%
Into the EU8%
At berth in the EU30%

92% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (9,404 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

30.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

VALLE DI GRANADA
Oil tanker median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

VALLE DI GRANADA
Oil tanker median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

VALLE DI GRANADA
Oil tanker median

0.010.020.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+28%	+33%	−38%	+39%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	−14%	−11%	+4%	–	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	+1%	+6%	+12%	–	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+5.0 kn	+15%	+122%	−6%	+24%	5.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.5 kn	−21%	−38%	+23%	+2,890%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−9.9 kn	+2%	−59%	−22%	+47%	9.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Navigazione Montanari SpA	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	Navigazione Montanari SpA	3,224	10,229	25,992	2,228	11.7	124.0	28.46	–
2023	not published	4,075	12,924	42,068	3,740	11.2	96.9	20.44	–
2022	not published	4,542	14,364	40,344	3,731	10.8	112.6	0.37	–
2021	not published	4,010	12,693	35,999	3,502	10.3	111.4	21.90	–
2020	not published	3,696	11,688	38,285	7,162	5.3	96.5	17.64	–
2019	not published	3,801	11,925	31,211	4,592	6.8	121.8	0.59	–
2018	not published	4,766	14,946	39,821	2,379	16.7	119.7	0.40	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Navigazione Montanari SpA	–	–	–	–	RINA	B
2024	Navigazione Montanari SpA	28.46	8.06	+253%	1,642 of 1,787	RINA	B
2023	not published	20.44	8.44	+142%	1,544 of 1,797	RINA	B
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	RINA	–
2021	not published	21.90	8.86	+147%	1,558 of 1,789	RINA	–
2020	not published	17.64	9.03	+95%	1,528 of 1,870	RINA	–
2019	not published	0.59	8.83	−93%	15 of 1,919	RINA	–
2018	not published	0.40	8.86	−95%	9 of 1,779	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.