Navalyze · Container · Ship

CONTI CORTESIA

IMO: 9293753
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 65,558 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.99 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CONTI 18. Container Schiffahrts-GmbH & Co. KG MS "CONTI CORTESIA"

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 65,558 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

315.1 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+78%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.00

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−8%)

Average speed

15.9 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+20%)

Fuel per day at sea

120.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,508 t

CO₂ emitted

10,949 t

11,122 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

11,135 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

701 h

29 days, 8% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 315.1 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+78%)

78.8Ranks 2,051 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 15.9 kn · median 13.3 (+20%)

9.1Faster than 89% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.00 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−8%)

7.22Ranks 1,013 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports95%
From the EU1%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU4%

22% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,455 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CONTI CORTESIA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CONTI CORTESIA
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CONTI CORTESIA
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+2.2 kn	+5%	+21%	−57%	−4%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	+18%	+14%	−59%	+19%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−4%	−8%	+16%	−18%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.2 kn	+1%	−13%	−7%	+42%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	−4%	−1%	+177%	−12%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	−16%	−18%	−55%	−7%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+5.8 kn	+44%	+120%	+1,129%	−14%	5.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 44%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	CONTI 18. Container Schiffahrts-GmbH & Co. KG MS "CONTI CORTESIA"	3,508	10,949	11,135	701	15.9	315.1	15.00	–
2024	CONTI 18. Container Schiffahrts-GmbH & Co. KG MS "CONTI CORTESIA"	7,841	24,548	26,067	1,899	13.7	300.8	15.70	–
2023	not published	16,172	50,533	63,242	4,476	14.1	255.7	13.21	–
2022	not published	14,537	45,709	54,666	3,702	14.8	265.9	16.06	–
2021	not published	15,441	48,385	58,521	3,438	17.0	263.9	11.31	–
2020	not published	5,818	18,135	21,111	1,287	16.4	275.6	12.84	–
2019	not published	15,398	48,018	46,858	2,790	16.8	328.6	13.81	–
2018	not published	870	2,713	3,812	346	11.0	228.2	15.98	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CONTI 18. Container Schiffahrts-GmbH & Co. KG MS "CONTI CORTESIA"	15.00	16.30	−8%	1,013 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	CONTI 18. Container Schiffahrts-GmbH & Co. KG MS "CONTI CORTESIA"	15.70	17.52	−10%	865 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023	not published	13.21	19.40	−32%	615 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	16.06	19.13	−16%	770 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	11.31	17.90	−37%	420 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	12.84	17.58	−27%	561 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	13.81	18.88	−27%	558 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	15.98	20.22	−21%	602 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.