Navalyze · Container · Ship

CONTI COURAGE

IMO: 9293789
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 79,635 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.98 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CONTI 22. Container Schiffahrts-GmbH & Co. KG MS "CONTI COURAGE"

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 53,225 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

319

Container median 174 kg/nm (+83%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

18.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−1%)

Average speed

15.5 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

118.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,078 t

CO₂ emitted

59,609 t

Distance sailed

59,827 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,855 h

161 days, 44% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 295 kg/nm · median 177 (+66%)

78.8Ranks 1,947 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.1 kn · median 13.3 (+6%)

9.1Faster than 61% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−29%)

7.22Ranks 753 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports38%
From the EU23%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,015 t

3.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CONTI COURAGE
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CONTI COURAGE
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CONTI COURAGE
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	+11%	+6%	+6%	−3%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+14%	+14%	−39%	+13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.5 kn	+6%	+18%	+222%	−7%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2022	+3.8 kn	+2%	+43%	+665%	−12%	3.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−6.1 kn	−32%	−59%	−98%	−31%	6.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 32%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.7 kn	+7%	+21%	+237%	+37%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CONTI 22. Container Schiffahrts-GmbH & Co. KG MS "CONTI COURAGE"	6,650	20,804	22,579	1,604	14.1	295	11.6	–
2024	CONTI 22. Container Schiffahrts-GmbH & Co. KG MS "CONTI COURAGE"	5,680	17,795	21,394	1,456	14.7	266	11.9	–
2023	not published	8,128	25,347	34,890	2,375	14.7	233	10.6	–
2022	not published	2,371	7,401	10,831	819	13.2	219	11.4	–
2020	not published	305	958	1,416	151	9.4	216	12.9	–
2019	not published	19,078	59,609	59,827	3,855	15.5	319	18.7	–
2018	not published	5,271	16,523	17,760	1,288	13.8	297	13.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CONTI 22. Container Schiffahrts-GmbH & Co. KG MS "CONTI COURAGE"	11.6	16.3	−29%	753 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	CONTI 22. Container Schiffahrts-GmbH & Co. KG MS "CONTI COURAGE"	11.9	17.5	−32%	598 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023	not published	10.6	19.4	−46%	427 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	11.4	19.1	−40%	436 of 1,825	DNV	C
2020	not published	12.9	17.6	−27%	568 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	18.7	18.9	−1%	883 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	13.7	20.2	−32%	474 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.