Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

CONTI CONTESSA

IMO
9293806
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
55,109 t
Port of registry
Madeira
Technical efficiency
EIV 18.90 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 55,109 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
280.1 kg/nm
Container median 172.2 kg/nm (+63%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
15.83
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.58 (−10%)
Average speed
17.9 kn
Container median 14.0 kn (+28%)
Fuel per day at sea
120.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,487 t
CO₂ emitted
4,629 t
Distance sailed
5,306 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
297 h
12 days, 3% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,797 container ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 280.1 kg/nm · median 172.2 (+63%)
80.4Ranks 1,447 of 1,797, lowest first314.7
Average speedThis ship 17.9 kn · median 14.0 (+28%)
10.4Faster than 98% of container ships16.6
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.83 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.58 (−10%)
7.14Ranks 782 of 1,797, lowest first52.30
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU96%
  • Into the EU2%
  • At berth in the EU3%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
2.6%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • CONTI CONTESSA
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • CONTI CONTESSA
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CONTI CONTESSA
  • Container median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2019→2020+3.3 kn+13%+38%−58%+11%3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2020not published1,4874,6295,30629717.9280.115.83–
2019not published3,1649,89912,72387014.6248.714.28–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2020not published15.8317.58−10%782 of 1,797DNVC
2019not published14.2818.88−24%594 of 1,788DNVC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

CONTI CONTESSA (IMO 9293806): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2019–2020 | Navalyze