Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC MUMBAI VIII

IMO: 9294991
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 61,658 t
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.97 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NORTHERN JADE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 60,493 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

324

Container median 174 kg/nm (+86%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

16.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−11%)

Average speed

15.7 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+15%)

Fuel per day at sea

122.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,836 t

CO₂ emitted

46,360 t

Distance sailed

45,726 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,915 h

121 days, 33% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 245 kg/nm · median 177 (+38%)

78.8Ranks 1,603 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.3 kn · median 13.3 (+15%)

9.1Faster than 81% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−24%)

7.22Ranks 817 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports60%
From the EU19%
Into the EU17%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,660 t

3.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC MUMBAI VIII
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC MUMBAI VIII
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC MUMBAI VIII
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	+0.3 kn	−13%	−11%	+125%	+12%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−2%	−3%	−8%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2022	+0.6 kn	−7%	−4%	+46%	+10%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.1 kn	−5%	−11%	−65%	−25%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+3.4 kn	+20%	+52%	+101%	+9%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	11,777	36,727	48,154	3,148	15.3	245	12.4	–
2023	not published	5,999	18,939	21,356	1,419	15.0	281	11.0	–
2022	not published	6,607	20,854	23,106	1,522	15.2	286	13.9	–
2020	not published	4,892	15,337	15,858	1,086	14.6	309	12.6	–
2019	not published	14,836	46,360	45,726	2,915	15.7	324	16.8	–
2018	not published	6,175	19,257	22,792	1,849	12.3	271	15.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	12.4	16.3	−24%	817 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	11.0	19.4	−43%	458 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	13.9	19.1	−27%	626 of 1,825	DNV	C
2020	not published	12.6	17.6	−28%	544 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	16.8	18.9	−11%	767 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	15.3	20.2	−24%	561 of 1,705	EnvService	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.