Navalyze · Container · Ship

EA BARU

IMO: 9295517
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,606 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 19.59 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: AS FRANZISKA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: AS Franziska Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH& Co.KG

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,606 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

98.4

Container median 182 kg/nm (−46%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

40.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+100%)

Average speed

8.7 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−37%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,203 t

CO₂ emitted

13,108 t

Distance sailed

42,712 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,911 h

205 days, 56% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 83.0 kg/nm · median 177 (−53%)

78.8Ranks 291 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 6.4 kn · median 13.3 (−52%)

9.1Faster than 2% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 56.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+247%)

7.22Ranks 2,091 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports41%
From the EU21%
Into the EU33%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

650 t

5.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EA BARU
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EA BARU
Container median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EA BARU
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.3 kn	+5%	−13%	+14%	+101%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	−1%	−13%	+183%	−36%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−3.2 kn	+6%	−22%	+303%	+38%	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.1 kn	−24%	−8%	−96%	−4%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.4 kn	+4%	−9%	+48%	+1%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+6.4 kn	−18%	+90%	−42%	−34%	6.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.9 kn	+19%	−34%	−53%	+24%	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-yearBio blend	AS Franziska Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH& Co.KG	330	1,007	3,667	407	9.0	90.0	46.8	–
2025	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	740	2,320	8,906	1,399	6.4	83.0	56.5	39%
2024	AS Franziska Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH& Co.KG	618	1,954	7,795	1,018	7.7	79.3	28.1	–
2023	not published	220	687	2,750	315	8.7	80.2	43.9	97%
2022	not published	52	162	682	58	11.9	76.0	31.7	91%
2021	not published	1,718	5,360	17,235	1,759	9.8	99.7	33.1	89%
2020	not published	1,116	3,484	11,660	1,041	11.2	95.7	32.8	–
2019	not published	2,373	7,406	20,274	4,221	4.8	117	49.9	–
2018	not published	4,203	13,108	42,712	4,911	8.7	98.4	40.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-yearBio blend	AS Franziska Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH& Co.KG	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2025	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	56.5	16.3	+247%	2,091 of 2,208	ABS	A
2024	AS Franziska Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH& Co.KG	28.1	17.5	+60%	1,407 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	43.9	19.4	+126%	1,597 of 1,899	ABS	B
2022	not published	31.7	19.1	+66%	1,334 of 1,825	ABS	B
2021	not published	33.1	17.9	+85%	1,368 of 1,781	ABS	B
2020	not published	32.8	17.6	+87%	1,380 of 1,797	ABS	B
2019	not published	49.9	18.9	+164%	1,545 of 1,788	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	40.4	20.2	+100%	1,355 of 1,705	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.