Navalyze · Container · Ship

BIANCA RAMBOW

IMO: 9297591
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 6,464 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Hamburg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 24.69 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Reederei Rambow GmbH & Co. KG MS “Bianca Rambow”

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,055 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

76.1

Container median 182 kg/nm (−58%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

39.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+96%)

Average speed

13.6 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,459 t

CO₂ emitted

14,040 t

Distance sailed

58,569 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,308 h

180 days, 49% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 72.9 kg/nm · median 177 (−59%)

78.8Ranks 141 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.4 kn · median 13.3 (+1%)

9.1Faster than 51% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 35.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+118%)

7.22Ranks 1,797 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports90%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU10%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,452 t

10.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BIANCA RAMBOW
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BIANCA RAMBOW
Container median

12.012.513.013.514.014.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BIANCA RAMBOW
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	−3%	−5%	−12%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	−8%	−3%	−5%	−8%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	−3%	−2%	+25%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	+2%	+0%	−11%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	+5%	+1%	−5%	+12%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.2 kn	−5%	+4%	+6%	−7%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.3 kn	+9%	−1%	−13%	+7%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Reederei Rambow GmbH & Co. KG MS “Bianca Rambow”	3,441	10,837	47,213	3,520	13.4	72.9	35.5	100%
2024	Reederei Rambow GmbH & Co. KG MS “Bianca Rambow”	4,033	12,834	53,758	3,915	13.7	75.0	40.0	–
2023	not published	4,610	14,514	56,827	4,359	13.0	81.1	43.7	–
2022	not published	3,811	12,049	45,474	3,551	12.8	83.8	43.9	–
2021	not published	4,213	13,402	51,052	3,914	13.0	82.5	44.1	–
2020	not published	4,254	13,461	53,951	3,983	13.5	78.8	39.4	–
2019	not published	4,215	13,336	50,814	4,124	12.3	83.0	42.4	–
2018	not published	4,459	14,040	58,569	4,308	13.6	76.1	39.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Reederei Rambow GmbH & Co. KG MS “Bianca Rambow”	35.5	16.3	+118%	1,797 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	Reederei Rambow GmbH & Co. KG MS “Bianca Rambow”	40.0	17.5	+128%	1,619 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	43.7	19.4	+125%	1,595 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	43.9	19.1	+129%	1,533 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	44.1	17.9	+146%	1,528 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	39.4	17.6	+124%	1,470 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	42.4	18.9	+125%	1,461 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	39.6	20.2	+96%	1,342 of 1,705	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.