Navalyze · Container · Ship

ENERGIZER

IMO: 9299501
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,943 t
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Harlingen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 28.90 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: m.s. Energizer Bewaarder B.V.

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,320 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

85.2

Container median 165 kg/nm (−48%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

59.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (+207%)

Average speed

14.3 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+8%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,233 t

CO₂ emitted

15,775 t

Distance sailed

61,380 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,285 h

179 days, 49% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 85.4 kg/nm · median 177 (−52%)

78.8Ranks 340 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 13.3 (+11%)

9.1Faster than 75% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 53.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+231%)

7.22Ranks 2,064 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports91%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,439 t

9.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ENERGIZER
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ENERGIZER
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ENERGIZER
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	−2%	+3%	+2%	−4%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	+2%	+1%	−11%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−2%	−5%	+6%	+81%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2022	+4.3 kn	+6%	+49%	+7%	−29%	4.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−4.0 kn	+1%	−27%	−8%	−5%	4.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.9 kn	−0%	+6%	−5%	+3%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	m.s. Energizer Bewaarder B.V.	4,765	14,864	55,813	3,759	14.8	85.4	53.9	–
2024	m.s. Energizer Bewaarder B.V.	4,767	14,800	54,624	3,870	14.1	87.3	56.3	–
2023	not published	5,233	15,775	61,380	4,285	14.3	85.2	59.5	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	5,027	10,068	57,772	3,895	14.8	87.0	32.8	–
2020	not published	4,460	14,033	54,136	5,157	10.5	82.4	46.2	–
2019	not published	4,801	15,145	58,598	4,033	14.5	81.9	48.3	–
2018	not published	5,072	16,001	61,769	4,530	13.6	82.1	47.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	m.s. Energizer Bewaarder B.V.	53.9	16.3	+231%	2,064 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	m.s. Energizer Bewaarder B.V.	56.3	17.5	+221%	1,830 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	59.5	19.4	+207%	1,779 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022LNG / alt.	not published	32.8	19.1	+72%	1,358 of 1,825	DNV	A
2020	not published	46.2	17.6	+163%	1,562 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	48.3	18.9	+156%	1,523 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	47.1	20.2	+133%	1,442 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.