Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM TOSCA

IMO: 9299783
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 36,775 t
Port of registry: Marseille
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 36,775 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

255.3 kg/nm

Container median 165.1 kg/nm (+55%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

18.04

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.40 (−7%)

Average speed

12.1 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

74.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

680 t

CO₂ emitted

1,766 t

Distance sailed

2,662 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

219 h

9 days, 3% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,899 container ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 255.3 kg/nm · median 165.1 (+55%)

77.6Ranks 1,532 of 1,899, lowest first290.9

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 13.2 (−8%)

10.0Faster than 31% of container ships15.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.04 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.40 (−7%)

7.34Ranks 874 of 1,899, lowest first51.88

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports36%
From the EU16%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

94%

6% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

7.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CMA CGM TOSCA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM TOSCA
Container median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM TOSCA
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2022→2023	+2.0 kn	−9%	+10%	−91%	+33%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−4.0 kn	−1%	−30%	−42%	+1%	4.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+22%	+22%	−17%	+29%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	−15%	−14%	−19%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.8 kn	−6%	−0%	+97%	−41%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2023LNG	not published	680	1,766	2,662	219	12.1	255.3	18.04	94%
2022	not published	8,357	26,363	29,924	2,970	10.1	279.3	13.52	95%
2021	not published	14,664	46,305	51,803	3,661	14.1	283.1	13.45	91%
2020	not published	14,576	46,006	62,560	4,452	14.1	233.0	10.42	100%
2019	not published	21,285	66,489	77,690	5,582	13.9	274.0	10.72	97%
2018	not published	11,481	35,848	39,339	3,003	13.1	291.8	18.15	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023LNG	not published	18.04	19.40	−7%	874 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	13.52	19.13	−29%	602 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	13.45	17.90	−25%	588 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	10.42	17.58	−41%	412 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	10.72	18.88	−43%	377 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	18.15	20.22	−10%	742 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.