Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

AMIRA RAFIF

IMO: 9300192
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 29,574 t
Flag (estimated): San Marino
Port of registry: San Marino
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.52 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SARONIC SPIRE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Elamira Maritime Ltd

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 19,308 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

81.3

Bulk carrier median 86.1 kg/nm (−6%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.27 (+60%)

Average speed

11.6 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.8 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,825 t

CO₂ emitted

8,857 t

Distance sailed

34,752 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,990 h

125 days, 34% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 76.4 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−8%)

61.0Ranks 1,347 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 8.9 kn · median 10.7 (−17%)

8.8Faster than 11% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.09 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+2%)

4.80Ranks 1,881 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU61%
Into the EU30%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

424 t

4.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AMIRA RAFIF
Bulk carrier median

50.060.070.080.090.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AMIRA RAFIF
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

AMIRA RAFIF
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.9 kn	+17%	−4%	−58%	−29%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	−20%	−26%	−35%	−13%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	+11%	+9%	+157%	+86%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.9 kn	−13%	−7%	−53%	−6%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	+9%	+18%	+70%	−25%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.7 kn	−6%	+13%	−48%	+4%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−4.0 kn	+6%	−28%	+359%	–	4.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Elamira Maritime Ltd	729	2,284	9,545	1,071	8.9	76.4	8.09	–
2024	Elamira Maritime Ltd	1,486	4,668	22,711	2,106	10.8	65.4	11.5	–
2023	not published	2,825	8,857	34,752	2,990	11.6	81.3	13.2	–
2022	not published	993	3,100	13,521	1,138	11.9	73.5	11.8	–
2021	not published	2,422	7,607	28,587	2,588	11.0	84.7	11.7	–
2020	not published	1,302	4,085	16,791	1,643	10.2	77.5	12.6	–
2019	not published	2,660	8,352	32,382	3,792	8.5	82.2	11.3	–
2018	not published	547	1,704	7,052	566	12.5	77.6	11.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Elamira Maritime Ltd	8.09	7.90	+2%	1,881 of 3,611	ICS Verification Services	A
2024	Elamira Maritime Ltd	11.5	8.09	+42%	2,431 of 3,089	ICS Verification Services	A
2023	not published	13.2	8.27	+60%	2,927 of 3,548	Swiss Climate	A
2022	not published	7.09	21.6	−67%	53 of 1,034	Lloyd's Register	A
2021	not published	7.51	22.7	−67%	38 of 1,142	Lloyd's Register	A
2020	not published	10.0	24.5	−59%	95 of 1,167	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	9.57	25.0	−62%	77 of 1,154	Lloyd's Register	A
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.