Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

EVER SUPERB

IMO
9300427
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
55,435 t
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EIV 18.27 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 55,435 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
272.0 kg/nm
Container median 174.4 kg/nm (+56%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
15.30
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.88 (−19%)
Average speed
15.4 kn
Container median 13.7 kn (+12%)
Fuel per day at sea
100.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,431 t
CO₂ emitted
7,581 t
Distance sailed
8,938 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
579 h
24 days, 7% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,788 container ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 272.0 kg/nm · median 174.4 (+56%)
82.1Ranks 1,396 of 1,788, lowest first308.8
Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 13.7 (+12%)
8.6Faster than 75% of container ships16.5
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.30 g CO₂/t·nm · median 18.88 (−19%)
7.86Ranks 678 of 1,788, lowest first55.28
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports18%
  • From the EU7%
  • Into the EU71%
  • At berth in the EU4%
Fuel burned laden
96%
4% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
4.3%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • EVER SUPERB
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • EVER SUPERB
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • EVER SUPERB
  • Container median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2018→2019+1.3 kn+9%+19%−54%−3%1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2019not published2,4317,5818,93857915.4272.015.3096%
2018not published4,85315,16219,3781,37114.1250.415.83–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2019not published15.3018.88−19%678 of 1,788ABSC
2018not published15.8320.22−22%595 of 1,705ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

EVER SUPERB (IMO 9300427): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2019 | Navalyze