Navalyze · Container · Ship

SALGUEIRO

IMO: 9301562
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,048 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.80 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: GEESKE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Nortada Shipmanagement Lda

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,048 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

91.2 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−48%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

56.45

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+246%)

Average speed

7.9 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−41%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

728 t

CO₂ emitted

2,276 t

2,312 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

7,988 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,013 h

42 days, 12% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 91.2 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−48%)

78.8Ranks 417 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 7.9 kn · median 13.3 (−41%)

9.1Faster than 5% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 56.45 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+246%)

7.22Ranks 2,087 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports42%
From the EU11%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU3%

73% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,656 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SALGUEIRO
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SALGUEIRO
Container median

0.05.010.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SALGUEIRO
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.2 kn	−21%	−7%	−57%	−39%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	−9%	−19%	+205%	–	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	+27%	+8%	−63%	–	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.9 kn	+16%	+30%	−12%	−27%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	−15%	−20%	+60%	+60%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+4.0 kn	−1%	+88%	−36%	−42%	4.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	−7%	+8%	+4%	+0%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Nortada Shipmanagement Lda	728	2,276	7,988	1,013	7.9	91.2	56.45	–
2024	Nortada Shipmanagement Lda	2,122	6,624	18,427	2,736	6.7	115.2	92.38	–
2023	not published	762	2,405	6,048	791	7.6	126.0	118.96	–
2022	not published	1,618	5,184	16,268	1,820	8.9	99.5	49.77	–
2021	not published	1,582	4,990	18,459	2,321	8.0	85.7	68.59	–
2020	not published	1,160	3,664	11,525	1,355	8.5	100.7	42.87	–
2019	not published	1,834	5,748	17,959	4,033	4.5	102.1	73.46	–
2018	not published	1,909	5,959	17,349	4,525	3.8	110.0	73.20	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Nortada Shipmanagement Lda	56.45	16.30	+246%	2,087 of 2,208	Verifavia	A
2024	Nortada Shipmanagement Lda	92.38	17.52	+427%	1,950 of 1,974	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	EnvService	B
2022	not published	49.77	19.13	+160%	1,608 of 1,825	EnvService	B
2021	not published	68.59	17.90	+283%	1,731 of 1,781	EnvService	B
2020	not published	42.87	17.58	+144%	1,513 of 1,797	EnvService	B
2019	not published	73.46	18.88	+289%	1,724 of 1,788	EnvService	B
2018	not published	73.20	20.22	+262%	1,628 of 1,705	EnvService	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.