Navalyze · Container · Ship

LUCIE SCHULTE

IMO: 9301926
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 12,286 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CARLTON PARK SHIPPING CO PTE LTD

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 16,912 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

142

Container median 178 kg/nm (−20%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

26.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (+38%)

Average speed

15.5 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

52.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,210 t

CO₂ emitted

38,550 t

Distance sailed

86,049 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,563 h

232 days, 64% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 135 kg/nm · median 177 (−24%)

78.8Ranks 815 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.1 kn · median 13.3 (+14%)

9.1Faster than 79% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 34.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+111%)

7.22Ranks 1,782 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU54%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

520 t

1.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LUCIE SCHULTE
Container median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LUCIE SCHULTE
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LUCIE SCHULTE
Container median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	+9%	+16%	−36%	+33%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	−5%	−11%	−29%	−2%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−8%	−10%	−8%	−1%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+2.9 kn	+12%	+38%	+568%	−1%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	−6%	+2%	−73%	+1%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.9 kn	−19%	−36%	−38%	–	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−2.2 kn	−2%	−14%	−16%	–	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CARLTON PARK SHIPPING CO PTE LTD	4,927	15,417	36,446	2,409	15.1	135	34.4	–
2024	CARLTON PARK SHIPPING CO PTE LTD	7,037	22,052	56,717	4,002	14.2	124	25.8	–
2023	not published	10,418	32,553	79,531	5,293	15.0	131	26.2	–
2022	not published	12,210	38,550	86,049	5,563	15.5	142	26.5	–
2021	not published	1,636	5,200	12,875	1,024	12.6	127	26.7	–
2020	not published	6,478	20,477	47,938	4,148	11.6	135	26.5	–
2019	not published	12,939	40,403	77,620	5,337	14.5	167	–	–
2018	not published	15,760	49,124	92,856	5,564	16.7	170	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CARLTON PARK SHIPPING CO PTE LTD	34.4	16.3	+111%	1,782 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	CARLTON PARK SHIPPING CO PTE LTD	25.8	17.5	+47%	1,354 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	26.2	19.4	+35%	1,232 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	26.5	19.1	+38%	1,197 of 1,825	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	26.7	17.9	+49%	1,227 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	26.5	17.6	+51%	1,263 of 1,797	DNV	A+C
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+C
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.