Navalyze · Container · Ship

ONE HENRY HUDSON

IMO: 9302176
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 59,410 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: HENRY HUDSON BRIDGE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FUKUJIN KISEN CO., LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 59,410 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

227.1 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+28%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.93

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−27%)

Average speed

13.7 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

74.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,042 t

CO₂ emitted

34,468 t

35,010 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

48,632 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,541 h

148 days, 40% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 227.1 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+28%)

78.8Ranks 1,455 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 13.7 kn · median 13.3 (+3%)

9.1Faster than 56% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.93 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−27%)

7.22Ranks 786 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU51%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU2%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (18,227 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.6 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ONE HENRY HUDSON
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ONE HENRY HUDSON
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ONE HENRY HUDSON
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−0%	−5%	−32%	–	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.8 kn	−18%	−27%	+486%	–	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+4.2 kn	+4%	+41%	−54%	−3%	4.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.5 kn	+10%	−9%	+1%	+12%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−2.5 kn	−6%	−20%	−58%	−1%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−8%	−8%	+118%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	FUKUJIN KISEN CO., LTD.	11,042	34,468	48,632	3,541	13.7	227.1	11.93	–
2024	FUKUJIN KISEN CO., LTD.	16,246	50,787	71,400	4,960	14.4	227.5	–	–
2023	not published	3,377	10,671	12,179	751	16.2	277.3	11.91	–
2022	not published	7,072	22,459	26,497	2,217	12.0	266.9	12.30	–
2021	not published	6,353	20,139	26,275	1,814	14.5	241.8	10.96	–
2020	not published	16,001	50,521	62,391	3,666	17.0	256.5	11.09	–
2019	not published	7,925	24,855	28,579	1,678	17.0	277.3	11.57	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	FUKUJIN KISEN CO., LTD.	11.93	16.30	−27%	786 of 2,208	ClassNK	C
2024	FUKUJIN KISEN CO., LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	11.91	19.40	−39%	532 of 1,899	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	12.30	19.13	−36%	504 of 1,825	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	10.96	17.90	−39%	401 of 1,781	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	11.09	17.58	−37%	447 of 1,797	ClassNK	–
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.