Navalyze · Container · Ship

ONE HENRY HUDSON

IMO: 9302176
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 59,410 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: HENRY HUDSON BRIDGE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FUKUJIN KISEN CO., LTD.

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 73,017 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

257

Container median 172 kg/nm (+49%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−37%)

Average speed

17.0 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+21%)

Fuel per day at sea

104.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,001 t

CO₂ emitted

50,521 t

Distance sailed

62,391 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,666 h

153 days, 42% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 227 kg/nm · median 177 (+28%)

78.8Ranks 1,455 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.7 kn · median 13.3 (+3%)

9.1Faster than 56% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−27%)

7.22Ranks 786 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU51%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

935 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ONE HENRY HUDSON
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ONE HENRY HUDSON
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ONE HENRY HUDSON
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−0%	−5%	−32%	–	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.8 kn	−18%	−27%	+486%	–	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+4.2 kn	+4%	+41%	−54%	−3%	4.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.5 kn	+10%	−9%	+1%	+12%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−2.5 kn	−6%	−20%	−58%	−1%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−8%	−8%	+118%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	FUKUJIN KISEN CO., LTD.	11,042	34,468	48,632	3,541	13.7	227	11.9	–
2024	FUKUJIN KISEN CO., LTD.	16,246	50,787	71,400	4,960	14.4	228	–	–
2023	not published	3,377	10,671	12,179	751	16.2	277	11.9	–
2022	not published	7,072	22,459	26,497	2,217	12.0	267	12.3	–
2021	not published	6,353	20,139	26,275	1,814	14.5	242	11.0	–
2020	not published	16,001	50,521	62,391	3,666	17.0	257	11.1	–
2019	not published	7,925	24,855	28,579	1,678	17.0	277	11.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	FUKUJIN KISEN CO., LTD.	11.9	16.3	−27%	786 of 2,208	ClassNK	C
2024	FUKUJIN KISEN CO., LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	11.9	19.4	−39%	532 of 1,899	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	12.3	19.1	−36%	504 of 1,825	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	11.0	17.9	−39%	401 of 1,781	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	11.1	17.6	−37%	447 of 1,797	ClassNK	–
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.