Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

LIRICA

IMO: 9302982
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 114,972 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia, Liberia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.90 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: STATIA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Trust Marine Management Limited

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

206

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

14.5 kn

Fuel per day at sea

71.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

324 t

CO₂ emitted

1,016 t

Distance sailed

1,572 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

108 h

5 days, 1% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 220 kg/nm · median 129 (+71%)

76.1Ranks 1,585 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 10.7 (+1%)

8.0Faster than 52% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.05 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−24%)

4.51Ranks 458 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU79%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU21%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

218 t

21.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LIRICA
Oil tanker median

125.0150.0175.0200.0225.0

’182018’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LIRICA
Oil tanker median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LIRICA
Oil tanker median

5.06.07.08.09.0

’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.1 kn	+44%	+77%	−61%	−23%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 44%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.5 kn	−17%	−29%	+134%	+15%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	+28%	+24%	−74%	−15%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	+10%	+4%	+36%	+55%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2021	−3.3 kn	−36%	−51%	+1,440%	–	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 36%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Trust Marine Management Limited	1,687	5,339	7,676	712	10.8	220	6.05	–
2024	BOCIMAR INTERNATIONAL NV	3,039	9,512	19,874	2,272	8.7	153	7.81	–
2023	not published	1,570	4,982	8,482	828	10.2	185	6.82	–
2022	not published	4,769	15,057	32,918	3,117	10.6	145	8.04	–
2021	not published	3,177	9,957	24,212	2,165	11.2	131	5.18	–
2018	not published	324	1,016	1,572	108	14.5	206	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Trust Marine Management Limited	6.05	7.95	−24%	458 of 1,665	Korean Register	A
2024	BOCIMAR INTERNATIONAL NV	7.81	8.06	−3%	845 of 1,787	EMICERT	A
2023	not published	6.82	8.44	−19%	607 of 1,797	EMICERT	A
2022	not published	8.04	8.51	−6%	900 of 1,961	EMICERT	A
2021	not published	5.18	8.86	−42%	256 of 1,789	EMICERT	A
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	EMICERT	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.