Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

NORDIC CASTOR

IMO
9303247
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
66,377 t
Port of registry
Georgetown
Technical efficiency
EIV 3.39 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 66,377 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
193.0 kg/nm
Oil tanker median 137.8 kg/nm (+40%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
9.09
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.83 (+3%)
Average speed
11.4 kn
Oil tanker median 9.7 kn (+18%)
Fuel per day at sea
52.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
5,696 t
CO₂ emitted
17,810 t
Distance sailed
29,517 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,583 h
108 days, 29% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,919 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 193.0 kg/nm · median 137.8 (+40%)
82.4Ranks 1,654 of 1,919, lowest first206.7
Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 9.7 (+18%)
6.1Faster than 78% of oil tanker ships12.0
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.09 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.83 (+3%)
4.60Ranks 1,006 of 1,919, lowest first24.95
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU34%
  • Into the EU49%
  • At berth in the EU17%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
16.6%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • NORDIC CASTOR
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • NORDIC CASTOR
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • NORDIC CASTOR
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2018→2019−0.9 kn+7%−0%−59%+11%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2019not published5,69617,81029,5172,58311.4193.09.09–
2018not published13,02040,69672,1405,88312.3180.58.19–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2019not published9.098.83+3%1,006 of 1,919ABSA
2018not published8.198.86−8%788 of 1,779ABSA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

NORDIC CASTOR (IMO 9303247): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2019 | Navalyze