Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

CHRYSOPIGI

IMO: 9303728
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 15,059 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EIV 7.71 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ANCORA INVESTMENT TRUST INC

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 15,059 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

180.4 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (+40%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

38.15

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+380%)

Average speed

10.5 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

45.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,324 t

CO₂ emitted

13,773 t

13,985 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

23,973 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,290 h

95 days, 26% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 180.4 kg/nm · median 128.5 (+40%)

76.1Ranks 1,430 of 1,665, lowest first190.8

Average speedThis ship 10.5 kn · median 10.7 (−2%)

8.0Faster than 42% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 38.15 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+380%)

4.51Ranks 1,570 of 1,665, lowest first27.66

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports57%
From the EU1%
Into the EU4%
At berth in the EU38%

98% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (13,447 t).

Fuel burned laden

31%

69% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

38.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CHRYSOPIGI
Oil tanker median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CHRYSOPIGI
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CHRYSOPIGI
Oil tanker median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	+54%	+38%	+107%	+29%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 54%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−24%	−23%	−30%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	+15%	+16%	−5%	+68%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+5.5 kn	+1%	+94%	−3%	−21%	5.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.3 kn	−16%	+7%	+126%	−17%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−3.9 kn	+62%	−12%	−70%	+39%	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 62%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	−20%	−22%	+41%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	ANCORA INVESTMENT TRUST INC	4,324	13,773	23,973	2,290	10.5	180.4	38.15	31%
2024	ANCORA INVESTMENT TRUST INC	1,361	4,267	11,608	993	11.7	117.2	29.47	46%
2023	not published	2,565	8,076	16,538	1,442	11.5	155.1	33.95	60%
2022	not published	2,360	7,416	17,429	1,535	11.4	135.4	20.16	66%
2021	not published	2,414	7,558	17,985	3,049	5.9	134.2	25.42	53%
2020	not published	1,274	4,013	7,946	1,719	4.6	160.3	30.51	–
2019	not published	2,636	8,232	26,587	3,111	8.5	99.2	21.98	–
2018	not published	2,353	7,372	18,914	2,177	8.7	124.4	21.09	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ANCORA INVESTMENT TRUST INC	38.15	7.95	+380%	1,570 of 1,665	ABS	A
2024	ANCORA INVESTMENT TRUST INC	29.47	8.06	+266%	1,651 of 1,787	ABS	A
2023	not published	33.95	8.44	+302%	1,684 of 1,797	ABS	A
2022	not published	20.16	8.51	+137%	1,700 of 1,961	ABS	A
2021	not published	25.42	8.86	+187%	1,617 of 1,789	ABS	A
2020	not published	30.51	9.03	+238%	1,733 of 1,870	ABS	A
2019	not published	21.98	8.83	+149%	1,671 of 1,919	ABS	A
2018	not published	21.09	8.86	+138%	1,555 of 1,779	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.