Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC AGATA III

IMO: 9304734
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 12,897 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: 0215 E.R. CAMILLA, 0215 CINDY, CINDY

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Avelios Alpha Shipping LLC

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 12,897 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

123.4 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−30%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

30.54

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+87%)

Average speed

12.0 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

35.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,858 t

CO₂ emitted

9,118 t

9,258 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

23,149 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,935 h

81 days, 22% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 123.4 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−30%)

78.8Ranks 731 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 12.0 kn · median 13.3 (−10%)

9.1Faster than 30% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 30.54 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+87%)

7.22Ranks 1,696 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports28%
From the EU27%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU7%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,231 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

6.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC AGATA III
Container median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC AGATA III
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC AGATA III
Container median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.2 kn	+7%	+19%	+158%	+44%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	−10%	−14%	−61%	+3%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	−15%	−11%	+233%	−18%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+24%	+18%	−57%	+32%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.6 kn	−17%	−4%	−0%	−12%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	+11%	+16%	+76%	+7%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Avelios Alpha Shipping LLC	520	1,622	3,940	270	14.6	131.9	285.78	–
2025	Darina Oceanway Limited	2,858	9,118	23,149	1,935	12.0	123.4	30.54	–
2024	Avelios Alpha Shipping LLC	1,030	3,224	8,975	830	10.8	114.8	21.27	–
2023	not published	2,974	9,316	23,219	2,056	11.3	128.1	20.63	–
2022	not published	1,047	3,273	6,976	642	10.9	150.1	25.30	–
2021	not published	1,965	6,147	16,268	1,431	11.4	120.8	19.14	–
2020	not published	2,381	7,444	16,310	1,671	9.8	146.0	21.80	–
2019	not published	1,222	3,807	9,258	997	9.3	132.1	20.38	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Avelios Alpha Shipping LLC	–	–	–	–	EnvService	A
2025	Darina Oceanway Limited	30.54	16.30	+87%	1,696 of 2,208	EnvService	A+C
2024	Avelios Alpha Shipping LLC	21.27	17.52	+21%	1,194 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	20.63	19.40	+6%	1,018 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	25.30	19.13	+32%	1,155 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	19.14	17.90	+7%	946 of 1,781	Verifavia	B
2020	not published	21.80	17.58	+24%	1,087 of 1,797	Verifavia	B
2019	not published	20.38	18.88	+8%	983 of 1,788	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.