Navalyze · Container · Ship

BILBAO TRADER

IMO: 9306835
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 5,138 t
Flag (estimated): Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry: St. Johns
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.57 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MAGNUS F, ASTRID L

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hermann Lohmann Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG MS "ASTRID L" · part of Hermann Lohmann

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,639 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

107

Other median 90.4 kg/nm (+18%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

50.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Other median 72.9 (−30%)

Average speed

10.4 kn

Other median 10.1 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,319 t

CO₂ emitted

16,737 t

Distance sailed

49,742 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,765 h

199 days, 54% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 69.6 kg/nm · median 177 (−61%)

78.8Ranks 106 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 8.3 kn · median 13.3 (−38%)

9.1Faster than 6% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 42.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+160%)

7.22Ranks 1,919 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports86%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU14%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,340 t

14.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BILBAO TRADER
General cargo median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BILBAO TRADER
General cargo median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BILBAO TRADER
General cargo median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	−37%	−38%	+644%	+35%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 37%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+3.6 kn	+52%	+169%	+423%	+6%	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 52%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−7.4 kn	−17%	−68%	−97%	−12%	7.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	+3%	+8%	+40%	−8%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.4 kn	−25%	−33%	+61%	−34%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 25%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+20%	+22%	−72%	+34%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+2.6 kn	−13%	+9%	−14%	−18%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Hermann Lohmann Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG MS "ASTRID L"	253	792	2,840	347	8.2	89.0	43.6	–
2025	Ada Marine Denizcilik Dis Ticaret Limited	2,453	7,657	35,223	4,228	8.3	69.6	42.3	–
2024	Hermann Lohmann Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG MS "ASTRID L"	521	1,633	4,732	560	8.4	110	45.2	–
2023	not published	65	205	904	189	4.8	72.4	–	–
2022	not published	2,389	7,534	27,365	2,238	12.2	87.3	51.5	–
2021	not published	1,653	5,212	19,571	1,666	11.7	84.5	–	–
2020	not published	1,364	4,312	12,135	923	13.1	112	–	–
2019	not published	3,988	12,635	42,693	3,275	13.0	93.4	41.5	–
2018	not published	5,319	16,737	49,742	4,765	10.4	107	50.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Hermann Lohmann Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG MS "ASTRID L"	–	–	–	–	RINA	A
2025	Ada Marine Denizcilik Dis Ticaret Limited	42.3	16.3	+160%	1,919 of 2,208	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2024	Hermann Lohmann Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG MS "ASTRID L"	31.4	19.3	+63%	930 of 1,111	RINA	A
2023	not published	29.7	20.7	+44%	818 of 1,045	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	33.7	21.6	+56%	834 of 1,034	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	36.7	22.7	+62%	976 of 1,142	RINA	A
2020	not published	55.6	24.5	+127%	1,076 of 1,167	RINA	A
2019	not published	41.5	18.9	+120%	1,445 of 1,788	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	50.7	72.9	−30%	38 of 87	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.