Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ELARA

IMO: 9309148
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 3,712 t
Flag (estimated): Tuvalu
Port of registry: Funafuti
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.62 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: GUYENNE, VS LARA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: VALLOEBY LARA LTD · part of Valloeby

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,327 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

66.3

Chemical tanker median 85.7 kg/nm (−23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

49.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (+204%)

Average speed

7.5 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.4 kn (−34%)

Fuel per day at sea

12.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,989 t

CO₂ emitted

6,376 t

Distance sailed

30,002 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,992 h

166 days, 46% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 66.8 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−16%)

52.8Ranks 407 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 7.0 kn · median 11.1 (−37%)

8.8Faster than 4% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 57.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+281%)

7.93Ranks 1,410 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports50%
From the EU17%
Into the EU20%
At berth in the EU14%

Fuel burned laden

996 t

50% of all fuel; 50% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

881 t

13.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ELARA
Chemical tanker median

60.070.080.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ELARA
Chemical tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ELARA
Chemical tanker median

0.050.0100150

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−6%	−3%	+9%	−41%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−32%	−30%	+93%	+18%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 32%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.6 kn	+35%	+77%	−37%	+46%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 35%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	+20%	+35%	−22%	−5%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.1 kn	−2%	−42%	−24%	+21%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−2.1 kn	−27%	−43%	+104%	–	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	+2%	+4%	−46%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	VALLOEBY LARA LTD	1,477	4,714	21,758	3,214	6.8	67.9	58.8	–
2025	Lea Shipping Corporation Ltd.	1,593	5,081	23,869	3,424	7.0	66.8	57.4	–
2024	VALLOEBY LARA LTD	1,552	4,976	21,842	3,204	6.8	71.1	97.1	–
2023	not published	1,183	3,794	11,297	1,721	6.6	105	82.6	42%
2022	not published	1,388	4,451	17,828	3,586	5.0	77.9	56.5	33%
2021	not published	1,486	4,764	22,849	5,194	4.4	65.0	59.5	36%
2020	not published	1,989	6,376	30,002	3,992	7.5	66.3	49.1	50%
2019	not published	1,339	4,217	14,730	1,539	9.6	90.9	192	–
2018	not published	2,435	7,593	27,252	2,910	9.4	89.3	146	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	VALLOEBY LARA LTD	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2025	Lea Shipping Corporation Ltd.	57.4	15.0	+281%	1,410 of 1,460	Verifavia	B
2024	VALLOEBY LARA LTD	97.1	16.7	+480%	1,269 of 1,274	DNV	A
2023	not published	82.6	16.2	+409%	1,301 of 1,314	ABS	A
2022	not published	56.5	16.1	+252%	1,364 of 1,409	ABS	A
2021	not published	59.5	16.7	+257%	1,301 of 1,343	ABS	A
2020	not published	49.1	16.2	+204%	1,237 of 1,312	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2018	not published	146	17.1	+754%	1,285 of 1,294	Bureau Veritas	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.