Navalyze · Container · Ship

MONA LISA

IMO: 9309277
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 20,407 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.34 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: UNIVERSAL SHIPPING ALLIANCE LTD

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 20,407 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

173.9 kg/nm

Container median 167.2 kg/nm (+4%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

26.68

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.52 (+52%)

Average speed

12.1 kn

Container median 13.5 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

50.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,233 t

CO₂ emitted

19,508 t

19,814 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

35,830 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,953 h

123 days, 34% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 173.9 kg/nm · median 167.2 (+4%)

78.9Ranks 1,044 of 1,974, lowest first301.6

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 13.5 (−10%)

9.6Faster than 29% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 26.68 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.52 (+52%)

7.33Ranks 1,374 of 1,974, lowest first51.62

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports28%
From the EU30%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU6%

67% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (13,072 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MONA LISA
Container median

100.0150.0200.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

MONA LISA
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MONA LISA
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−1.9 kn	+25%	+9%	−23%	−70%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.6 kn	+12%	+37%	+169%	+18%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.0 kn	−36%	−45%	−71%	+177%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 36%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.1 kn	+25%	+37%	+73%	+16%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.8 kn	−26%	−3%	+22%	−16%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.6 kn	−13%	−7%	−17%	−10%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	UNIVERSAL SHIPPING ALLIANCE LTD	6,233	19,508	35,830	2,953	12.1	173.9	26.68	–
2023	not published	6,431	20,194	46,316	3,317	14.0	138.9	87.74	–
2022	not published	2,145	6,712	17,248	1,516	11.4	124.3	74.54	–
2021	not published	11,576	36,346	59,826	4,464	13.4	193.5	26.87	–
2020	not published	5,348	16,710	34,669	2,821	12.3	154.2	23.13	–
2019	not published	5,903	18,435	28,506	3,009	9.5	207.1	27.41	–
2018	not published	8,194	25,535	34,530	3,892	8.9	237.3	30.57	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	UNIVERSAL SHIPPING ALLIANCE LTD	26.68	17.52	+52%	1,374 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	87.74	19.40	+352%	1,890 of 1,899	RINA	A
2022	not published	74.54	19.13	+290%	1,779 of 1,825	RINA	A
2021	not published	26.87	17.90	+50%	1,231 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	23.13	17.58	+32%	1,154 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	27.41	18.88	+45%	1,182 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	30.57	20.22	+51%	1,182 of 1,705	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.