Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

LADY OF DORIA

IMO
9310812
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
17,951 t
Port of registry
Chattogram
Technical efficiency
EIV 7.15 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
HIGH GLOW
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,951 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
97.6 kg/nm
Oil tanker median 129.1 kg/nm (−24%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
17.28
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.44 (+105%)
Average speed
11.0 kn
Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (+0%)
Fuel per day at sea
25.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
377 t
CO₂ emitted
1,199 t
Distance sailed
3,867 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
351 h
15 days, 4% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,797 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 97.6 kg/nm · median 129.1 (−24%)
80.4Ranks 394 of 1,797, lowest first192.7
Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 11.0 (+0%)
8.1Faster than 49% of oil tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.28 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.44 (+105%)
4.78Ranks 1,481 of 1,797, lowest first25.50
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU28%
  • Into the EU64%
  • At berth in the EU8%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
7.7%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • LADY OF DORIA
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • LADY OF DORIA
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • LADY OF DORIA
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2018→2023+0.6 kn+15%+22%−83%+90%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2023not published3771,1993,86735111.097.617.28–
2018not published1,9095,99722,4802,16310.484.99.0882%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2023not published17.288.44+105%1,481 of 1,797ClassNKA
2018not published9.088.86+2%923 of 1,779ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

LADY OF DORIA (IMO 9310812): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2023 | Navalyze