Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ANTIOCHIA KA

IMO: 9311751
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 16,980 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.74 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: MAERSK ARCTIC, ESEN KA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: White Tankers Gemi Isletmeciligi ve Tic. A.S.

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 16,980 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

102.4 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 80.8 kg/nm (+27%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.06

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.73 (+14%)

Average speed

10.0 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.0 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

546 t

CO₂ emitted

1,725 t

1,751 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

5,329 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

532 h

22 days, 6% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,274 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 102.4 kg/nm · median 80.8 (+27%)

53.8Ranks 1,042 of 1,274, lowest first110.8

Average speedThis ship 10.0 kn · median 11.0 (−9%)

8.7Faster than 26% of chemical tanker ships12.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.06 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.73 (+14%)

8.47Ranks 744 of 1,274, lowest first41.97

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU51%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU5%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (929 t).

Fuel burned laden

71%

29% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

4.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ANTIOCHIA KA
Chemical tanker median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

ANTIOCHIA KA
Chemical tanker median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ANTIOCHIA KA
Chemical tanker median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−11%	−12%	+43%	−44%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−15%	−9%	−37%	+27%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.3 kn	+43%	+15%	−86%	+91%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 43%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	−12%	−15%	+22%	−27%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	+17%	+25%	−20%	+21%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.9 kn	−12%	−5%	+9%	−11%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	White Tankers Gemi Isletmeciligi ve Tic. A.S.	412	1,304	3,651	609	6.0	112.8	44.18	20%
2024	White Tankers Gemi Isletmeciligi ve Tic. A.S.	546	1,725	5,329	532	10.0	102.4	19.06	71%
2023	not published	428	1,344	3,727	369	10.1	115.0	33.79	–
2022	not published	795	2,496	5,885	619	9.5	135.1	26.68	–
2021	not published	3,937	12,390	41,683	3,526	11.8	94.5	13.99	–
2020	not published	3,667	11,506	34,244	2,784	12.3	107.1	19.29	–
2019	not published	3,918	12,348	42,758	3,716	11.5	91.6	15.98	–
2018	not published	4,086	12,911	39,258	3,687	10.6	104.1	17.92	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	White Tankers Gemi Isletmeciligi ve Tic. A.S.	–	–	–	–	ABS	A
2024	White Tankers Gemi Isletmeciligi ve Tic. A.S.	19.06	16.73	+14%	744 of 1,274	ABS	A
2023	not published	33.79	16.23	+108%	1,080 of 1,314	ABS	A
2022	not published	26.68	8.51	+214%	1,786 of 1,961	ABS	A
2021	not published	13.99	8.86	+58%	1,329 of 1,789	ABS	B+C
2020	not published	19.29	9.03	+114%	1,571 of 1,870	ABS	B+C
2019	not published	15.98	8.83	+81%	1,528 of 1,919	ABS	B+C
2018	not published	17.92	8.86	+102%	1,489 of 1,779	ABS	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.