Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

LUMINA T

IMO
9312080
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
11,498 t
Port of registry
Panama
Technical efficiency
EIV 12.82 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IA
Former names
PATAGONIA, NORSIGN WAVE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: IMZA MARINE DENIZCILIK AS

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,498 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
93.4 kg/nm
Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (−27%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
25.66
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+223%)
Average speed
8.0 kn
Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−25%)
Fuel per day at sea
18.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
978 t
CO₂ emitted
3,089 t
3,137 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
10,470 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,304 h
54 days, 15% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 93.4 kg/nm · median 128.5 (−27%)
76.1Ranks 360 of 1,665, lowest first190.8
Average speedThis ship 8.0 kn · median 10.7 (−25%)
8.0Faster than 10% of oil tanker ships12.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 25.66 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+223%)
4.51Ranks 1,474 of 1,665, lowest first27.66
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports15%
  • From the EU70%
  • Into the EU15%
  • At berth in the EU0%

43% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,316 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
0.3%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • LUMINA T
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • LUMINA T
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • LUMINA T
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025+2.2 kn−2%+36%−45%−1%2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−4.4 kn+22%−31%−46%−28%4.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+0.3 kn−1%+2%+1%+23%Same speed, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022+1.8 kn−32%−17%+114%−43%1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 32%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−2.0 kn−10%−28%−13%−17%2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+5.8 kn+32%+210%−29%+54%5.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 32%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−3.1 kn+10%−37%−35%+12%3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025part-yearIMZA MARINE DENIZCILIK AS1645202,0112219.181.839.19–
2025AETHER TANKER VE DENIZCILIK AS9783,08910,4701,3048.093.425.66–
2024part-year58. PHOENIX PCT UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “NEPTUN“7492,4027,92076210.494.632.40–
2024IMZA MARINE DENIZCILIK AS1,8235,81919,1823,3065.895.025.79–
2023not published2,7688,87335,4623,48910.278.035.71–
2022not published2,7688,84335,1263,5609.978.829.00–
2021not published1,9006,05016,3922,0328.1115.950.96–
2020not published2,4277,78218,9321,88210.1128.261.72–
2019not published2,5898,20826,5976,2084.397.339.95–
2018not published3,60811,37540,6925,4757.488.735.80–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025part-yearIMZA MARINE DENIZCILIK AS––––Lloyd's RegisterA+B
2025AETHER TANKER VE DENIZCILIK AS25.667.95+223%1,474 of 1,665Lloyd's RegisterA
2024part-year58. PHOENIX PCT UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “NEPTUN“––––Swiss ClimateA
2024IMZA MARINE DENIZCILIK AS25.798.06+220%1,610 of 1,787Lloyd's RegisterA
2023not published35.718.44+323%1,693 of 1,797Swiss ClimateA
2022not published29.0016.06+81%1,113 of 1,409Swiss ClimateA
2021not published50.9616.69+205%1,270 of 1,343Swiss ClimateA
2020not published61.7216.16+282%1,282 of 1,312Swiss ClimateA
2019not published39.9517.32+131%1,162 of 1,321Swiss ClimateA
2018not published35.8017.14+109%1,084 of 1,294Swiss ClimateA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

LUMINA T (IMO 9312080): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze