Navalyze · Container · Ship

CT ENDEAVOR

IMO: 9312195
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,086 t
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 27.63 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: ENDEAVOR

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Contarga Ltd.

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,925 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

79.2

Container median 182 kg/nm (−56%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

50.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+148%)

Average speed

13.1 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,741 t

CO₂ emitted

17,895 t

Distance sailed

72,496 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,538 h

231 days, 63% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 81.7 kg/nm · median 177 (−54%)

78.8Ranks 269 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.7 kn · median 13.3 (−5%)

9.1Faster than 41% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 50.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+209%)

7.22Ranks 2,029 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports97%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

453 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CT ENDEAVOR
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CT ENDEAVOR
Container median

12.513.013.514.014.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CT ENDEAVOR
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	−1%	−1%	−19%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	+4%	+5%	+78%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	+5%	+3%	−40%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−2%	−5%	+5%	+15%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	−1%	+3%	−8%	−7%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	−4%	−2%	−11%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	+2%	−2%	−8%	+10%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Contarga Ltd.	4,049	12,697	49,580	3,899	12.7	81.7	50.4	–
2024	m.s. Endeavor Custodian B.V.	5,074	15,866	61,524	4,832	12.7	82.5	51.8	–
2023	not published	2,736	8,575	34,611	2,750	12.6	79.0	46.1	–
2022	not published	4,348	13,604	57,706	4,493	12.8	75.3	58.5	–
2021	not published	4,219	13,179	54,773	4,135	13.2	77.0	51.1	–
2020	not published	4,653	14,509	59,543	4,678	12.7	78.1	54.9	–
2019	not published	5,431	16,932	67,024	5,313	12.6	81.0	55.3	–
2018	not published	5,741	17,895	72,496	5,538	13.1	79.2	50.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Contarga Ltd.	50.4	16.3	+209%	2,029 of 2,208	EnvService	B
2024	m.s. Endeavor Custodian B.V.	51.8	17.5	+195%	1,783 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	46.1	19.4	+137%	1,629 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	58.5	19.1	+206%	1,695 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	51.1	17.9	+185%	1,614 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	54.9	17.6	+212%	1,637 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	55.3	18.9	+193%	1,609 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	50.1	20.2	+148%	1,485 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.