Navalyze · Container · Ship

ENDURANCE

IMO: 9312200
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,172 t
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Harlingen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 27.63 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: m.s. Endurance Bewaarder B.V.

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,137 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

75.1

Container median 165 kg/nm (−55%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

56.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (+193%)

Average speed

11.9 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,030 t

CO₂ emitted

15,735 t

Distance sailed

66,961 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,613 h

234 days, 64% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 80.8 kg/nm · median 177 (−54%)

78.8Ranks 252 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.3 kn · median 13.3 (−8%)

9.1Faster than 34% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 60.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+271%)

7.22Ranks 2,117 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports55%
From the EU26%
Into the EU17%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

332 t

2.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ENDURANCE
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ENDURANCE
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ENDURANCE
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	+1%	+0%	−11%	+39%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+7%	+11%	−7%	−23%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	+3%	+11%	+9%	+20%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.1 kn	−3%	−19%	−1%	−4%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	−11%	−7%	+0%	−1%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.5 kn	+3%	−8%	−16%	+20%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	−8%	−3%	+5%	−2%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	m.s. Endurance Bewaarder B.V.	4,484	13,992	55,475	4,526	12.3	80.8	60.5	–
2024	m.s. Endurance Bewaarder B.V.	4,978	15,567	62,249	5,027	12.4	80.0	43.5	–
2023	not published	5,030	15,735	66,961	5,613	11.9	75.1	56.8	–
2022	not published	4,485	14,228	61,509	5,560	11.1	72.9	47.5	–
2021	not published	4,688	14,755	62,077	4,716	13.2	75.5	49.3	–
2020	not published	5,241	16,596	61,963	4,906	12.6	84.6	49.9	–
2019	not published	6,067	19,215	74,062	5,259	14.1	81.9	41.5	–
2018	not published	6,284	19,896	70,345	5,262	13.4	89.3	42.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	m.s. Endurance Bewaarder B.V.	60.5	16.3	+271%	2,117 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	m.s. Endurance Bewaarder B.V.	43.5	17.5	+149%	1,666 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	56.8	19.4	+193%	1,757 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	47.5	19.1	+148%	1,573 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	49.3	17.9	+175%	1,596 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	49.9	17.6	+184%	1,596 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	41.5	18.9	+120%	1,445 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	42.4	20.2	+109%	1,384 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.