Navalyze · Container · Ship

ENSEMBLE

IMO: 9312212
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,961 t
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Harlingen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 27.63 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: m.s. Ensemble Bewaarder B.V.

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,809 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

76.0

Container median 178 kg/nm (−57%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

50.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (+161%)

Average speed

12.7 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,204 t

CO₂ emitted

16,447 t

Distance sailed

68,455 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,400 h

225 days, 62% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 81.0 kg/nm · median 177 (−54%)

78.8Ranks 256 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 13.3 (−7%)

9.1Faster than 35% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 51.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+214%)

7.22Ranks 2,036 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports29%
From the EU44%
Into the EU25%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

350 t

2.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ENSEMBLE
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ENSEMBLE
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ENSEMBLE
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	+0%	+5%	+49%	+2%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	+7%	+0%	−41%	+2%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−1%	−1%	−14%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	−2%	−4%	+16%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	+5%	+9%	−8%	−5%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	−8%	−11%	−19%	+6%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	+4%	+0%	−4%	+12%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	m.s. Ensemble Bewaarder B.V.	4,201	13,171	51,885	4,189	12.4	81.0	51.2	–
2024	m.s. Ensemble Bewaarder B.V.	2,808	8,803	34,726	2,938	11.8	80.9	50.4	–
2023	not published	4,461	14,015	58,993	4,682	12.6	75.6	49.5	–
2022	not published	5,204	16,447	68,455	5,400	12.7	76.0	50.0	–
2021	not published	4,599	14,388	59,051	4,608	12.8	77.9	54.9	–
2020	not published	4,736	14,932	64,057	5,151	12.4	73.9	57.9	–
2019	not published	6,379	20,255	79,527	6,205	12.8	80.2	54.5	–
2018	not published	6,399	20,330	83,237	6,235	13.3	76.9	48.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	m.s. Ensemble Bewaarder B.V.	51.2	16.3	+214%	2,036 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	m.s. Ensemble Bewaarder B.V.	50.4	17.5	+188%	1,763 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	49.5	19.4	+155%	1,677 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	50.0	19.1	+161%	1,611 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	54.9	17.9	+206%	1,647 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	57.9	17.6	+229%	1,668 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	54.5	18.9	+189%	1,600 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	48.6	20.2	+140%	1,461 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.