Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC VULCANO II

IMO: 9313228
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 9,042 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 19.90 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super
Former names: BALTIC SHEAREWATER, BALTIC SHEARWATER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,042 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

104.7 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−41%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

36.48

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+124%)

Average speed

8.8 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−34%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,904 t

CO₂ emitted

12,302 t

12,493 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

37,296 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,225 h

176 days, 48% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 104.7 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−41%)

78.8Ranks 578 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 8.8 kn · median 13.3 (−34%)

9.1Faster than 9% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 36.48 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+124%)

7.22Ranks 1,813 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports72%
From the EU12%
Into the EU10%
At berth in the EU6%

18% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,274 t).

Fuel burned laden

66%

34% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

6.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC VULCANO II
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC VULCANO II
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC VULCANO II
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−3.2 kn	−2%	−27%	−28%	−18%	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	+17%	+19%	+16%	+31%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−6%	−7%	−18%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.8 kn	−3%	−16%	−1%	−1%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	+8%	+12%	−11%	−29%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.2 kn	−3%	+6%	+6%	+15%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.3 kn	−3%	+8%	+21%	+16%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	3,904	12,302	37,296	4,225	8.8	104.7	36.48	66%
2024	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	5,531	17,388	52,006	4,336	12.0	106.3	44.50	82%
2023	not published	4,060	12,949	44,718	3,798	11.8	90.8	33.99	–
2022	not published	5,265	16,668	54,707	4,596	11.9	96.2	30.77	–
2021	not published	5,486	17,375	55,210	4,038	13.7	99.4	31.00	–
2020	not published	5,712	18,240	61,934	4,721	13.1	92.2	43.94	–
2019	not published	5,579	17,615	58,489	4,898	11.9	95.4	38.25	–
2018	not published	4,759	15,026	48,208	4,527	10.6	98.7	32.95	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	36.48	16.30	+124%	1,813 of 2,208	DNV	C
2024	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	44.50	17.52	+154%	1,678 of 1,974	ABS	A
2023	not published	33.99	19.40	+75%	1,434 of 1,899	Korean Register	A
2022	not published	30.77	19.13	+61%	1,312 of 1,825	Korean Register	A
2021	not published	31.00	17.90	+73%	1,329 of 1,781	Korean Register	A
2020	not published	43.94	17.58	+150%	1,526 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	38.25	18.88	+103%	1,391 of 1,788	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	32.95	20.22	+63%	1,222 of 1,705	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.