Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship
ARC RESOLVE
- IMO
- 9316141
- Type
- Vehicle carrier
- Average cargo carried
- 4,742 t
- Port of registry
- Wilmington, De
- Technical efficiency
- EIV 22.32 g CO₂/t·nm
- Former names
- OTELLO
2020 at a glance
From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,742 t of cargo on average.
Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2020
Set against all 449 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.
Where the emissions happen, 2020
THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.
- Between EU ports0%
- From the EU19%
- Into the EU79%
- At berth in the EU2%
Over the years
Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.
Fuel per mile, kg/nm
- ARC RESOLVE
- Vehicle carrier median
Average speed, kn
- ARC RESOLVE
- Vehicle carrier median
CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm
- ARC RESOLVE
- Vehicle carrier median
Year on year
| Year | Speed | Fuel per mile | Fuel per day | Distance | CO₂ per TW | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019→2020 | −3.3 kn | −16% | −34% | −79% | −19% | 3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2018→2019 | +0.9 kn | +7% | +14% | −10% | −18% | 0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.
Every reporting year
One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.
Operation
| Year | ISM company | Fuel t | CO₂ t | Distance nm | At sea h | Speed kn | Fuel kg/nm | CO₂ g/t·nm | Laden fuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | not published | 190 | 594 | 1,811 | 143 | 12.6 | 104.9 | 69.16 | – |
| 2019 | not published | 1,084 | 3,406 | 8,635 | 543 | 15.9 | 125.5 | 85.46 | – |
| 2018 | not published | 1,125 | 3,526 | 9,596 | 641 | 15.0 | 117.2 | 103.76 | – |
Benchmark and verification
| Year | ISM company | CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm | Vehicle carrier median | vs Vehicle carrier | Rank | Verifier | Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | not published | 69.16 | 57.26 | +21% | 303 of 449 | DNV | B+C |
| 2019 | not published | 85.46 | 58.95 | +45% | 332 of 426 | DNV | B+C |
| 2018 | not published | 103.76 | 62.35 | +66% | 351 of 434 | Lloyd's Register | B+C |
Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.