Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC CELINE

IMO
9316361
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
16,232 t
Port of registry
Panama
Technical efficiency
EIV 17.17 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 16,232 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
141.8 kg/nm
Container median 172.2 kg/nm (−18%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
27.31
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.58 (+55%)
Average speed
12.4 kn
Container median 14.0 kn (−11%)
Fuel per day at sea
42.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
4,848 t
CO₂ emitted
15,151 t
Distance sailed
34,178 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,753 h
115 days, 31% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,797 container ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 141.8 kg/nm · median 172.2 (−18%)
80.4Ranks 737 of 1,797, lowest first314.7
Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 14.0 (−11%)
10.4Faster than 28% of container ships16.6
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 27.31 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.58 (+55%)
7.14Ranks 1,283 of 1,797, lowest first52.30
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports49%
  • From the EU21%
  • Into the EU22%
  • At berth in the EU8%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
7.8%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • MSC CELINE
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • MSC CELINE
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MSC CELINE
  • Container median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2019→2020+0.9 kn−3%+4%−40%−14%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+3.5 kn−7%+34%+114%+37%3.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2020not published4,84815,15134,1782,75312.4141.827.31–
2019not published8,35426,22356,9404,94711.5146.731.87–
2018not published4,17313,04126,5843,3098.0157.023.18–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2020not published27.3117.58+55%1,283 of 1,797DNVC
2019not published31.8718.88+69%1,296 of 1,788DNVC
2018not published23.1820.22+15%980 of 1,705DNVC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

MSC CELINE (IMO 9316361): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2020 | Navalyze