Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

OPTIMAX II

IMO
9316579
Type
General cargo ship
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EEDI 25.29 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
PANTANAL
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
63.5 kg/nm
General cargo median 55.1 kg/nm (+15%)
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
52.32
g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.50 (+114%)
Average speed
6.7 kn
General cargo median 10.7 kn (−37%)
Fuel per day at sea
10.2 t/day
Fuel consumed
53 t
CO₂ emitted
166 t
Distance sailed
831 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
124 h
5 days, 1% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,167 general cargo ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 63.5 kg/nm · median 55.1 (+15%)
36.0Ranks 731 of 1,167, lowest first90.9
Average speedThis ship 6.7 kn · median 10.7 (−37%)
8.2Faster than 2% of general cargo ships12.9
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 52.32 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 24.50 (+114%)
11.30Ranks 1,065 of 1,167, lowest first48.87
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU80%
  • Into the EU18%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
57%
43% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
1.5%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • OPTIMAX II
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • OPTIMAX II
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

  • OPTIMAX II
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2019→2020−2.7 kn+5%−25%−88%−2%2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019−0.7 kn−19%−25%−55%+45%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2020not published531668311246.763.5–57%
2019not published4231,3216,9797449.460.6––
2018not published1,1723,67415,6621,55610.174.8––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2020not published52.3224.50+114%1,065 of 1,167Lloyd's RegisterA
2019not published53.5224.96+114%1,031 of 1,154Swiss ClimateA
2018not published36.8024.89+48%794 of 1,044Swiss ClimateA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

OPTIMAX II (IMO 9316579): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2020 | Navalyze