Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

JIUYANG BLOSSOM

IMO: 9318474
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 5,935 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 15.70 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: HOEGH BANGKOK

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: HMC Shipmanagement Co.,Ltd.

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,935 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

101.6 kg/nm

Vehicle carrier median 103.3 kg/nm (−2%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

53.61

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 55.31 (−3%)

Average speed

16.1 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

39.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,967 t

CO₂ emitted

6,159 t

6,256 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

19,359 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,202 h

50 days, 14% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 335 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 101.6 kg/nm · median 103.3 (−2%)

80.4Ranks 149 of 335, lowest first119.6

Average speedThis ship 16.1 kn · median 14.4 (+12%)

12.3Faster than 89% of vehicle carrier ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 53.61 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.31 (−3%)

37.69Ranks 160 of 335, lowest first158.40

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU29%
Into the EU65%
At berth in the EU2%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,241 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

JIUYANG BLOSSOM
Vehicle carrier median

95.0100.0105.0110.0115.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

Average speed, kn

JIUYANG BLOSSOM
Vehicle carrier median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

JIUYANG BLOSSOM
Vehicle carrier median

20.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2022→2024	+1.6 kn	+5%	+17%	−58%	+40%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+2.2 kn	−3%	+15%	+146%	−22%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	−4%	−1%	+30%	−44%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−8%	−8%	−71%	+32%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.0 kn	+13%	−3%	−6%	+16%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	HMC Shipmanagement Co.,Ltd.	1,967	6,159	19,359	1,202	16.1	101.6	53.61	–
2022	not published	4,490	13,343	46,439	3,204	14.5	96.7	38.33	–
2021	not published	1,874	5,899	18,901	1,538	12.3	99.2	49.32	–
2020	not published	1,494	4,735	14,500	1,210	12.0	103.0	88.82	–
2019	not published	5,583	17,571	50,043	4,174	12.0	111.6	67.31	–
2018	not published	5,264	16,553	53,227	3,802	14.0	98.9	58.23	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	HMC Shipmanagement Co.,Ltd.	53.61	55.31	−3%	160 of 335	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	38.33	57.66	−34%	31 of 463	DNV	A+C
2021	not published	49.32	59.57	−17%	128 of 459	DNV	A
2020	not published	88.82	57.26	+55%	360 of 449	DNV	A
2019	not published	67.31	58.95	+14%	277 of 426	DNV	A
2018	not published	58.23	62.35	−7%	172 of 434	DNV	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.