Navalyze · Container · Ship

RMS ROSE

IMO: 9318761
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,345 t
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 25.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: ADILIA I

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS "07" Jens u. Waller GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,345 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

61.4 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−65%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

44.47

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+173%)

Average speed

10.8 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−19%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,457 t

CO₂ emitted

4,581 t

4,653 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

23,712 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,199 h

92 days, 25% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 61.4 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−65%)

78.8Ranks 40 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 13.3 (−19%)

9.1Faster than 20% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 44.47 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+173%)

7.22Ranks 1,954 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports45%
From the EU30%
Into the EU21%
At berth in the EU4%

41% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,868 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

RMS ROSE
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

RMS ROSE
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

RMS ROSE
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	−23%	−16%	−42%	−14%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	−2%	−10%	−8%	+23%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	+1%	−2%	−20%	+23%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	+17%	+8%	+120%	−33%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.3 kn	−14%	−22%	−49%	−14%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+5.4 kn	+2%	+72%	+52%	+14%	5.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.8 kn	−13%	+13%	−10%	−37%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	MS "07" Jens u. Waller GmbH & Co. KG	631	1,968	8,212	740	11.1	76.8	51.31	–
2025	ROMES SHIPPING & INTERNATIONAL TRADING COMPANY LTD.	1,457	4,581	23,712	2,199	10.8	61.4	44.47	–
2024	MS "07" Jens u. Waller GmbH & Co. KG	3,250	10,174	40,915	4,138	9.9	79.4	51.74	–
2023	not published	3,589	11,229	44,299	4,124	10.7	81.0	41.96	–
2022	not published	4,461	13,943	55,614	5,014	11.1	80.2	34.03	–
2021	not published	1,740	5,512	25,273	2,098	12.0	68.8	50.44	–
2020	not published	3,941	12,531	49,538	3,722	13.3	79.6	58.62	–
2019	not published	2,542	8,010	32,650	4,135	7.9	77.9	51.50	–
2018	not published	3,265	10,286	36,452	5,971	6.1	89.6	81.43	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	MS "07" Jens u. Waller GmbH & Co. KG	–	–	–	–	EnvService	B
2025	ROMES SHIPPING & INTERNATIONAL TRADING COMPANY LTD.	44.47	16.30	+173%	1,954 of 2,208	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2024	MS "07" Jens u. Waller GmbH & Co. KG	51.74	17.52	+195%	1,781 of 1,974	EnvService	B
2023	not published	41.96	19.40	+116%	1,567 of 1,899	EnvService	B
2022	not published	34.03	19.13	+78%	1,382 of 1,825	EnvService	B
2021	not published	50.44	17.90	+182%	1,608 of 1,781	EnvService	B
2020	not published	58.62	17.58	+233%	1,677 of 1,797	EnvService	B
2019	not published	51.50	18.88	+173%	1,566 of 1,788	EnvService	B
2018	not published	81.43	20.22	+303%	1,650 of 1,705	EnvService	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.