Navalyze · Container · Ship

STADT DRESDEN

IMO: 9320049
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 16,390 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.47 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: AS CLARA OpCo B.V.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 16,390 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

114.6 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−35%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

21.92

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+34%)

Average speed

10.7 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−20%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,397 t

CO₂ emitted

10,649 t

10,815 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

29,639 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,762 h

115 days, 32% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 114.6 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−35%)

78.8Ranks 658 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 13.3 (−20%)

9.1Faster than 19% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 21.92 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+34%)

7.22Ranks 1,424 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports67%
From the EU23%
Into the EU7%
At berth in the EU3%

85% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (9,051 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

STADT DRESDEN
Container median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STADT DRESDEN
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

STADT DRESDEN
Container median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−2.7 kn	−11%	−29%	−22%	+14%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.3 kn	+11%	+35%	+8%	+3%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+2.9 kn	+1%	+37%	−20%	+10%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.9 kn	−14%	−36%	+21%	−21%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+7%	+9%	+5%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	−15%	−12%	−16%	−17%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.5 kn	+4%	−8%	−45%	+17%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	AS CLARA OpCo B.V.	3,397	10,649	29,639	2,762	10.7	114.6	21.92	–
2024	AS CLARA OpCo B.V.	4,887	15,255	38,041	2,829	13.4	128.5	19.18	–
2023	not published	4,044	12,629	35,062	3,166	11.1	115.3	18.58	–
2022	not published	5,023	15,679	43,951	5,388	8.2	114.3	16.83	–
2021	not published	4,793	14,962	36,263	3,273	11.1	132.2	21.25	–
2020	not published	4,246	13,261	34,451	3,174	10.9	123.2	22.35	–
2019	not published	5,945	18,559	41,021	3,909	10.5	144.9	26.88	–
2018	not published	10,256	31,992	73,960	6,178	12.0	138.7	23.06	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	AS CLARA OpCo B.V.	21.92	16.30	+34%	1,424 of 2,208	DNV	B
2024	AS CLARA OpCo B.V.	19.18	17.52	+9%	1,088 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	18.58	19.40	−4%	904 of 1,899	DNV	B
2022	not published	16.83	19.13	−12%	807 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	21.25	17.90	+19%	1,054 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	22.35	17.58	+27%	1,114 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	26.88	18.88	+42%	1,171 of 1,788	DNV	–
2018	not published	23.06	20.22	+14%	974 of 1,705	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.