Navalyze · Container · Ship

STADT DRESDEN

IMO: 9320049
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 16,390 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.47 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: AS CLARA OpCo B.V.

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 18,758 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

139

Container median 182 kg/nm (−24%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

23.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+14%)

Average speed

12.0 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−13%)

Fuel per day at sea

39.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,256 t

CO₂ emitted

31,992 t

Distance sailed

73,960 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,178 h

257 days, 71% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 115 kg/nm · median 177 (−35%)

78.8Ranks 658 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 13.3 (−20%)

9.1Faster than 19% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 21.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+34%)

7.22Ranks 1,424 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports48%
From the EU24%
Into the EU23%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,750 t

5.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

STADT DRESDEN
Container median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STADT DRESDEN
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

STADT DRESDEN
Container median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.7 kn	−11%	−29%	−22%	+14%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.3 kn	+11%	+35%	+8%	+3%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+2.9 kn	+1%	+37%	−20%	+10%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.9 kn	−14%	−36%	+21%	−21%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+7%	+9%	+5%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	−15%	−12%	−16%	−17%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.5 kn	+4%	−8%	−45%	+17%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	AS CLARA OpCo B.V.	3,397	10,649	29,639	2,762	10.7	115	21.9	–
2024	AS CLARA OpCo B.V.	4,887	15,255	38,041	2,829	13.4	129	19.2	–
2023	not published	4,044	12,629	35,062	3,166	11.1	115	18.6	–
2022	not published	5,023	15,679	43,951	5,388	8.2	114	16.8	–
2021	not published	4,793	14,962	36,263	3,273	11.1	132	21.3	–
2020	not published	4,246	13,261	34,451	3,174	10.9	123	22.4	–
2019	not published	5,945	18,559	41,021	3,909	10.5	145	26.9	–
2018	not published	10,256	31,992	73,960	6,178	12.0	139	23.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	AS CLARA OpCo B.V.	21.9	16.3	+34%	1,424 of 2,208	DNV	B
2024	AS CLARA OpCo B.V.	19.2	17.5	+9%	1,088 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	18.6	19.4	−4%	904 of 1,899	DNV	B
2022	not published	16.8	19.1	−12%	807 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	21.3	17.9	+19%	1,054 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	22.4	17.6	+27%	1,114 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	26.9	18.9	+42%	1,171 of 1,788	DNV	–
2018	not published	23.1	20.2	+14%	974 of 1,705	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.