Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC LAUSANNE VI

IMO: 9320398
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 48,695 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.50 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MSC LAUSANNE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 48,695 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

209.8 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+19%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.58

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−17%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

64.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,952 t

CO₂ emitted

34,522 t

35,059 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

52,204 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,049 h

169 days, 46% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 209.8 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+19%)

78.8Ranks 1,336 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 12.9 kn · median 13.3 (−3%)

9.1Faster than 43% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.58 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−17%)

7.22Ranks 896 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports72%
From the EU6%
Into the EU17%
At berth in the EU5%

70% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (24,254 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.6 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC LAUSANNE VI
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0260.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC LAUSANNE VI
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC LAUSANNE VI
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2025	−1.9 kn	−13%	−24%	+96%	−36%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	+11%	+11%	−66%	+27%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	−3%	−9%	+1%	+2%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	−2%	+3%	−1%	−7%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	−3%	+2%	−5%	+1%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	−5%	−7%	−0%	−1%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	10,952	34,522	52,204	4,049	12.9	209.8	13.58	–
2023	not published	6,383	20,044	26,581	1,798	14.8	240.1	21.13	–
2022	not published	17,052	53,934	79,105	5,308	14.9	215.6	16.69	96%
2021	not published	17,477	55,297	78,653	4,930	16.0	222.2	16.31	96%
2020	not published	18,006	56,997	79,271	5,229	15.2	227.1	17.59	–
2019	not published	19,542	61,291	83,772	5,769	14.5	233.3	17.43	–
2018	not published	20,542	64,386	83,890	5,647	14.9	244.9	17.55	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	13.58	16.30	−17%	896 of 2,208	DNV	C
2023	not published	21.13	19.40	+9%	1,048 of 1,899	EnvService	C
2022	not published	16.69	19.13	−13%	801 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	16.31	17.90	−9%	801 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	17.59	17.58	+0%	900 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	17.43	18.88	−8%	806 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	17.55	20.22	−13%	699 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.