Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC LAUSANNE VI

IMO: 9320398
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 48,695 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.50 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MSC LAUSANNE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 40,851 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

216

Container median 178 kg/nm (+21%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

16.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−13%)

Average speed

14.9 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

77.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,052 t

CO₂ emitted

53,934 t

Distance sailed

79,105 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,308 h

221 days, 61% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 210 kg/nm · median 177 (+19%)

78.8Ranks 1,336 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.9 kn · median 13.3 (−3%)

9.1Faster than 43% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−17%)

7.22Ranks 896 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports31%
From the EU52%
Into the EU13%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

16,370 t

96% of all fuel; 4% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2,168 t

4.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC LAUSANNE VI
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0260.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC LAUSANNE VI
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC LAUSANNE VI
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	−1.9 kn	−13%	−24%	+96%	−36%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	+11%	+11%	−66%	+27%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	−3%	−9%	+1%	+2%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	−2%	+3%	−1%	−7%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	−3%	+2%	−5%	+1%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	−5%	−7%	−0%	−1%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	10,952	34,522	52,204	4,049	12.9	210	13.6	–
2023	not published	6,383	20,044	26,581	1,798	14.8	240	21.1	–
2022	not published	17,052	53,934	79,105	5,308	14.9	216	16.7	96%
2021	not published	17,477	55,297	78,653	4,930	16.0	222	16.3	96%
2020	not published	18,006	56,997	79,271	5,229	15.2	227	17.6	–
2019	not published	19,542	61,291	83,772	5,769	14.5	233	17.4	–
2018	not published	20,542	64,386	83,890	5,647	14.9	245	17.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	13.6	16.3	−17%	896 of 2,208	DNV	C
2023	not published	21.1	19.4	+9%	1,048 of 1,899	EnvService	C
2022	not published	16.7	19.1	−13%	801 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	16.3	17.9	−9%	801 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	17.6	17.6	+0%	900 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	17.4	18.9	−8%	806 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	17.6	20.2	−13%	699 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.