Navalyze · Container · Ship

JOLLY BIANCO

IMO: 9320427
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 27,208 t
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Genoa
Technical efficiency: EIV 16.16 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MSC GENEVA, BUXWAVE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Ignazio Messina & C. S.p.A.

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 40,542 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

220

Container median 172 kg/nm (+28%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−3%)

Average speed

14.6 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

76.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,091 t

CO₂ emitted

57,018 t

Distance sailed

82,389 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,647 h

235 days, 64% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 178 kg/nm · median 177 (+1%)

78.8Ranks 1,111 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 13.3 (−16%)

9.1Faster than 24% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+28%)

7.22Ranks 1,378 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports62%
From the EU16%
Into the EU18%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,457 t

4.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

JOLLY BIANCO
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

JOLLY BIANCO
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

JOLLY BIANCO
Container median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−5.1 kn	−14%	−41%	−67%	−40%	5.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.1 kn	−2%	+5%	−46%	+71%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−9%	−8%	−4%	+44%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−5%	−7%	+3%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	+12%	+17%	−10%	−7%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	−5%	−2%	−3%	+4%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	+1%	−1%	+2%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Ignazio Messina & C. S.p.A.	2,323	7,386	13,058	1,162	11.2	178	20.8	–
2024part-year	Beteiligungs- KG MS "BUXWAVE" Verwaltungs- und Bereederungs GmbH & Co.	7,148	22,277	33,906	1,932	17.5	211	37.5	–
2024	Ignazio Messina & C. S.p.A.	8,228	25,653	39,685	2,433	16.3	207	34.4	–
2023	not published	15,589	49,053	73,528	4,831	15.2	212	20.1	–
2022	not published	17,715	55,882	76,239	5,039	15.1	232	13.9	95%
2021	not published	18,105	57,090	73,822	4,812	15.3	245	15.9	96%
2020	not published	18,091	57,018	82,389	5,647	14.6	220	17.1	–
2019	not published	19,640	61,424	84,891	6,031	14.1	231	16.5	–
2018	not published	19,049	59,505	83,002	5,813	14.3	230	16.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Ignazio Messina & C. S.p.A.	20.8	16.3	+28%	1,378 of 2,208	RINA	B
2024part-year	Beteiligungs- KG MS "BUXWAVE" Verwaltungs- und Bereederungs GmbH & Co.	–	–	–	–	EnvService	C
2024	Ignazio Messina & C. S.p.A.	34.4	17.5	+96%	1,540 of 1,974	RINA	B
2023	not published	20.1	19.4	+4%	993 of 1,899	EnvService	C
2022	not published	13.9	19.1	−27%	628 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	15.9	17.9	−11%	775 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	17.1	17.6	−3%	859 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	16.5	18.9	−13%	747 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	16.6	20.2	−18%	653 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.