Navalyze · Container · Ship

JOLLY VERDE

IMO: 9320441
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 26,818 t
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Genova
Technical efficiency: EIV 16.16 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MSC CAROUGE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Ignazio Messina & C. S.p.A.

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 47,147 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

251

Container median 186 kg/nm (+35%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

16.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−6%)

Average speed

15.9 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

96.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

20,492 t

CO₂ emitted

64,619 t

Distance sailed

81,632 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,124 h

214 days, 58% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 179 kg/nm · median 177 (+1%)

78.8Ranks 1,117 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 13.3 (−15%)

9.1Faster than 24% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 21.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+29%)

7.22Ranks 1,389 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports41%
From the EU38%
Into the EU16%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

19,590 t

96% of all fuel; 4% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2,876 t

4.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

JOLLY VERDE
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

JOLLY VERDE
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

JOLLY VERDE
Container median

16.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.0 kn	−12%	−25%	−38%	+15%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.4 kn	+4%	−7%	−54%	−13%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.5 kn	−18%	−26%	−8%	+27%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	−5%	−3%	−17%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	+6%	+10%	−4%	−4%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.5 kn	−3%	+9%	+6%	−1%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	−2%	−8%	−7%	−0%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Ignazio Messina & C. S.p.A.	3,222	10,170	17,998	1,594	11.3	179	21.1	–
2024part-year	Beteiligungs- KG MS "BUXWIND" Verwaltungs- und Bereederungs GmbH & Co.	3,730	11,674	17,952	1,345	13.3	208	16.7	–
2024	Ignazio Messina & C. S.p.A.	5,842	18,290	28,836	2,172	13.3	203	18.4	–
2023	not published	12,134	37,944	62,174	4,221	14.7	195	21.2	–
2022	not published	16,165	50,964	67,783	4,174	16.2	239	16.7	97%
2021	not published	20,492	64,619	81,632	5,124	15.9	251	16.8	96%
2020	not published	19,990	63,070	84,655	5,485	15.4	236	17.5	–
2019	not published	19,311	60,398	79,671	5,752	13.9	242	17.6	–
2018	not published	21,016	65,707	85,363	5,787	14.8	246	17.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Ignazio Messina & C. S.p.A.	21.1	16.3	+29%	1,389 of 2,208	RINA	B
2024part-year	Beteiligungs- KG MS "BUXWIND" Verwaltungs- und Bereederungs GmbH & Co.	–	–	–	–	EnvService	C
2024	Ignazio Messina & C. S.p.A.	18.4	17.5	+5%	1,034 of 1,974	RINA	B
2023	not published	21.2	19.4	+9%	1,048 of 1,899	EnvService	C
2022	not published	16.7	19.1	−13%	801 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	16.8	17.9	−6%	832 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	17.5	17.6	−1%	888 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	17.6	18.9	−7%	815 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	17.6	20.2	−13%	704 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.