Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

MILAHA QATAR

IMO: 9321732
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.54 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MILAHA QATAR GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

353

LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (+40%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

14.8

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (+42%)

Average speed

16.1 kn

LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

136.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,029 t

CO₂ emitted

47,205 t

Distance sailed

45,360 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,825 h

118 days, 32% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 349 kg/nm · median 190 (+83%)

152Ranks 369 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 15.0 kn · median 14.4 (+4%)

11.2Faster than 66% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 15.1 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+112%)

5.06Ranks 340 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU54%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

637 t

1.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MILAHA QATAR
LNG carrier median

100.0200.0300.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MILAHA QATAR
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

MILAHA QATAR
LNG carrier median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2022→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	+8%	+13%	−18%	+14%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	−15%	−16%	−7%	−17%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.7 kn	−2%	+9%	+15%	+1%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	+17%	+10%	−6%	+10%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	MILAHA QATAR GmbH & Co. KG	8,050	23,644	23,090	1,542	15.0	349	–	–
2024	MILAHA QATAR GmbH & Co. KG	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	16,029	47,205	45,360	2,825	16.1	353	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	18,085	53,210	55,400	3,613	15.3	326	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	22,875	67,087	59,757	3,827	15.6	383	–	–
2019	not published	20,352	60,054	51,938	3,727	13.9	392	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	18,542	53,423	55,385	3,728	14.9	335	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	MILAHA QATAR GmbH & Co. KG	15.1	7.12	+112%	340 of 386	DNV	B+C
2024	MILAHA QATAR GmbH & Co. KG	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	14.8	10.4	+42%	294 of 379	DNV	B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	13.0	10.5	+24%	202 of 289	DNV	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	15.6	10.7	+46%	227 of 267	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2019	not published	15.5	10.9	+43%	201 of 248	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	14.0	10.9	+29%	154 of 197	Lloyd's Register	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.