Navalyze · Container · Ship

RIDER

IMO: 9322566
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,053 t
Flag (estimated): Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry: St. John´S
Technical efficiency: EIV 38.93 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: JSP RIDER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Schiffahrts UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS "Rider"

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,724 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

75.1

Container median 174 kg/nm (−57%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

41.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+120%)

Average speed

15.0 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,368 t

CO₂ emitted

17,028 t

Distance sailed

71,496 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,780 h

199 days, 55% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 71.4 kg/nm · median 177 (−60%)

78.8Ranks 121 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 13.3 (+2%)

9.1Faster than 54% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 56.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+243%)

7.22Ranks 2,084 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports94%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

5,368 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,040 t

6.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

RIDER
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

RIDER
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

RIDER
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.4 kn	+7%	+18%	+27%	−5%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	−15%	−18%	+223%	+10%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.5 kn	+2%	−9%	−23%	+8%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	+6%	+2%	−60%	+12%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	−13%	−10%	+3%	−8%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	+11%	+7%	−12%	+16%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+4.4 kn	+6%	+49%	+30%	−8%	4.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Schiffahrts UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS "Rider"	5,917	18,792	82,833	6,092	13.6	71.4	56.0	–
2024	MS "JSP Rider" Schifffahrts UG (haft.) & Co. KG	4,354	13,752	65,047	5,318	12.2	66.9	59.1	–
2023	not published	1,585	4,985	20,150	1,590	12.7	78.7	53.8	–
2022	not published	2,012	6,376	26,164	1,846	14.2	76.9	49.8	–
2021	not published	4,716	15,015	64,905	4,381	14.8	72.7	44.3	–
2020	not published	5,254	16,763	63,219	4,393	14.4	83.1	48.2	–
2019	not published	5,368	17,028	71,496	4,780	15.0	75.1	41.6	100%
2018	not published	3,914	12,370	55,009	5,196	10.6	71.1	45.3	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Schiffahrts UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS "Rider"	56.0	16.3	+243%	2,084 of 2,208	Swiss Climate	A
2024	MS "JSP Rider" Schifffahrts UG (haft.) & Co. KG	59.1	17.5	+237%	1,844 of 1,974	Swiss Climate	A
2023	not published	53.8	19.4	+177%	1,730 of 1,899	Swiss Climate	A
2022	not published	49.8	19.1	+160%	1,610 of 1,825	Swiss Climate	A
2021	not published	44.3	17.9	+147%	1,532 of 1,781	Swiss Climate	A
2020	not published	48.2	17.6	+174%	1,581 of 1,797	Swiss Climate	A
2019	not published	41.6	18.9	+120%	1,446 of 1,788	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	45.3	20.2	+124%	1,417 of 1,705	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.