Navalyze · Container · Ship

TROUPER

IMO: 9326952
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,298 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 25.14 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS “Trouper” Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,422 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

82.8

Container median 174 kg/nm (−53%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

58.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+209%)

Average speed

13.0 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,441 t

CO₂ emitted

23,185 t

Distance sailed

89,897 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,890 h

287 days, 79% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 75.5 kg/nm · median 177 (−57%)

78.8Ranks 174 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 13.3 (−14%)

9.1Faster than 26% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 45.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+178%)

7.22Ranks 1,972 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU36%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

250 t

1.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TROUPER
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TROUPER
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TROUPER
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.8 kn	−9%	+7%	−11%	−2%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−1%	+1%	+8%	−20%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−4.2 kn	+9%	−25%	−46%	+20%	4.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	+10%	+12%	+11%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.6 kn	−8%	+3%	+2%	−11%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.0 kn	−7%	−14%	−11%	+3%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	+6%	+1%	−1%	+4%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MS “Trouper” Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG	3,512	11,165	46,533	4,054	11.5	75.5	45.3	–
2024	MS “Trouper” Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG	4,367	13,629	52,512	5,396	9.7	83.2	46.3	–
2023	not published	4,083	12,755	48,586	5,080	9.6	84.0	57.8	–
2022	not published	6,977	21,741	90,336	6,528	13.8	77.2	48.1	–
2021	not published	5,732	17,876	81,295	5,995	13.6	70.5	53.4	–
2020	not published	6,161	19,202	80,091	6,656	12.0	76.9	59.8	–
2019	not published	7,441	23,185	89,897	6,890	13.0	82.8	58.3	–
2018	not published	7,064	22,015	90,754	6,604	13.7	77.8	55.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS “Trouper” Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG	45.3	16.3	+178%	1,972 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	MS “Trouper” Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG	46.3	17.5	+164%	1,706 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	57.8	19.4	+198%	1,766 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	48.1	19.1	+152%	1,580 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	53.4	17.9	+198%	1,637 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	59.8	17.6	+240%	1,687 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	58.3	18.9	+209%	1,640 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	55.8	20.2	+176%	1,546 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.