Navalyze · Container · Ship

BALLATA

IMO: 9327578
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,803 t
Flag (estimated): Lithuania
Port of registry: Klaipeda
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.82 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: BENEDIKT RAMBOW, BENEDIKT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Limarko Shipping Company

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,923 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

86.1

Container median 165 kg/nm (−48%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

55.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (+186%)

Average speed

12.1 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,232 t

CO₂ emitted

16,594 t

Distance sailed

60,769 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,002 h

208 days, 57% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 83.3 kg/nm · median 177 (−53%)

78.8Ranks 298 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 10.0 kn · median 13.3 (−25%)

9.1Faster than 15% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 45.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+178%)

7.22Ranks 1,970 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports92%
From the EU1%
Into the EU1%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

974 t

5.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BALLATA
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BALLATA
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

BALLATA
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.5 kn	+8%	+27%	+13%	−11%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−3.6 kn	−11%	−37%	−24%	−8%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	−0%	+4%	−8%	+113%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	−1%	−8%	−0%	−12%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	−3%	+4%	+56%	+35%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+4.3 kn	−4%	+51%	+12%	−33%	4.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−2%	−2%	+56%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Limarko Shipping Company	4,349	13,710	52,181	5,231	10.0	83.3	45.3	–
2024part-year	1. B&R Schifffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG	3,099	9,698	40,509	4,515	9.0	76.5	50.4	–
2024	Limarko Shipping Company	3,535	11,059	46,060	5,393	8.5	76.8	50.8	–
2023	not published	5,232	16,594	60,769	5,002	12.1	86.1	55.5	–
2022	not published	5,718	18,016	66,331	5,672	11.7	86.2	38.2	–
2021	not published	5,788	18,237	66,517	5,297	12.6	87.0	–	–
2020	not published	3,803	12,006	42,537	3,606	11.8	89.4	–	–
2019	not published	3,544	11,070	38,077	5,071	7.5	93.1	58.1	–
2018	not published	2,319	7,241	24,372	3,260	7.5	95.2	66.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Limarko Shipping Company	45.3	16.3	+178%	1,970 of 2,208	DNV	B
2024part-year	1. B&R Schifffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG	–	–	–	–	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	Limarko Shipping Company	50.8	17.5	+190%	1,767 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	55.5	19.4	+186%	1,745 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	26.0	21.6	+21%	674 of 1,034	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	29.4	22.7	+30%	851 of 1,142	RINA	A
2020	not published	21.8	24.5	−11%	447 of 1,167	RINA	A
2019	not published	32.6	25.0	+31%	817 of 1,154	RINA	A
2018	not published	35.3	24.9	+42%	774 of 1,044	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.