Navalyze · Container · Ship

KANTATA

IMO: 9327580
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,674 t
Flag (estimated): Lithuania
Port of registry: Klaipeda
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.52 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Limarko Shipping Company

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

86.7

General cargo median 55.9 kg/nm (+55%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

49.8

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 22.7 (+119%)

Average speed

11.6 kn

General cargo median 10.9 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,258 t

CO₂ emitted

7,054 t

Distance sailed

26,045 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,245 h

94 days, 26% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 96.6 kg/nm · median 177 (−45%)

78.8Ranks 495 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 8.1 kn · median 13.3 (−39%)

9.1Faster than 6% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 65.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+299%)

7.22Ranks 2,144 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports30%
From the EU34%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

350 t

5.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

KANTATA
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

KANTATA
Container median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

KANTATA
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.8 kn	−2%	−20%	−4%	+8%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	+11%	+4%	−0%	+21%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	+5%	+4%	−30%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	−2%	−9%	+36%	+21%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−9%	−7%	+8%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+5.8 kn	+6%	+115%	−12%	−7%	5.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.1 kn	−16%	+4%	+26%	+1%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Limarko Shipping Company	2,271	7,143	23,520	2,895	8.1	96.6	65.0	–
2024	Limarko Shipping Company	2,428	7,572	24,567	2,479	9.9	98.8	60.2	–
2023	not published	2,204	6,873	24,637	2,325	10.6	89.4	49.7	–
2022	not published	2,998	9,364	35,311	3,286	10.7	84.9	–	–
2021	not published	2,258	7,054	26,045	2,245	11.6	86.7	–	–
2020	not published	2,293	7,154	24,089	2,114	11.4	95.2	55.5	–
2019	not published	2,456	7,658	27,296	4,880	5.6	90.0	59.4	–
2018	not published	2,313	7,208	21,652	4,766	4.5	107	58.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Limarko Shipping Company	65.0	16.3	+299%	2,144 of 2,208	DNV	B
2024	Limarko Shipping Company	60.2	17.5	+244%	1,858 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	49.7	19.4	+156%	1,677 of 1,899	DNV	B
2022	not published	60.2	21.6	+179%	978 of 1,034	DNV	B
2021	not published	49.8	22.7	+119%	1,070 of 1,142	DNV	B
2020	not published	55.5	17.6	+216%	1,642 of 1,797	DNV	–
2019	not published	59.4	18.9	+215%	1,649 of 1,788	DNV	–
2018	not published	58.6	20.2	+190%	1,569 of 1,705	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.