Navalyze · Container · Ship

JORK RULER

IMO: 9328027
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 3,862 t
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EIV 38.98 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS EH Meridian Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,507 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

72.1

Container median 182 kg/nm (−60%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

50.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+149%)

Average speed

15.0 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,460 t

CO₂ emitted

23,517 t

Distance sailed

103,533 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,888 h

287 days, 79% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 72.2 kg/nm · median 177 (−59%)

78.8Ranks 126 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.5 kn · median 13.3 (−6%)

9.1Faster than 37% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 59.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+262%)

7.22Ranks 2,106 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports71%
From the EU20%
Into the EU8%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

7,356 t

99% of all fuel; 1% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

238 t

1.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

JORK RULER
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

JORK RULER
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

JORK RULER
Container median

0.050.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−1%	−6%	+5%	+22%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−2%	−3%	+7%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	−0%	−6%	+21%	–	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+2%	−2%	−9%	–	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	+8%	+15%	−32%	−17%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	−6%	−10%	−16%	+32%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	−1%	−4%	−10%	−2%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MS EH Meridian Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	4,677	14,753	64,768	5,189	12.5	72.2	59.0	–
2024	MS EH Meridian Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	4,503	14,205	61,915	4,698	13.2	72.7	48.4	–
2023	not published	4,325	13,681	58,033	4,370	13.3	74.5	51.9	–
2022	not published	3,598	11,524	48,139	3,397	14.2	74.7	–	–
2021	not published	3,876	12,388	52,897	3,608	14.7	73.3	54.2	–
2020	not published	5,275	16,680	78,001	5,617	13.9	67.6	65.1	100%
2019	not published	6,692	21,100	93,325	6,441	14.5	71.7	49.2	100%
2018	not published	7,460	23,517	103,533	6,888	15.0	72.1	50.4	99%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS EH Meridian Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	59.0	16.3	+262%	2,106 of 2,208	Swiss Climate	A
2024	MS EH Meridian Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	48.4	17.5	+176%	1,729 of 1,974	Swiss Climate	A
2023	not published	51.9	19.4	+167%	1,711 of 1,899	Swiss Climate	A
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Swiss Climate	A
2021	not published	54.2	159	−66%	21 of 72	Swiss Climate	A
2020	not published	65.1	17.6	+271%	1,725 of 1,797	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	49.2	18.9	+161%	1,534 of 1,788	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	50.4	20.2	+149%	1,492 of 1,705	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.