Navalyze · Container · Ship

FREDERIK

IMO: 9328637
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 6,570 t
Flag (estimated): Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry: Saint-John'S
Technical efficiency: EEXI 19.30 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS "Frederik" Jens u. Waller GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,461 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

93.3

Container median 174 kg/nm (−47%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

28.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+50%)

Average speed

10.5 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−23%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,290 t

CO₂ emitted

16,814 t

Distance sailed

56,696 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,389 h

225 days, 62% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 81.1 kg/nm · median 177 (−54%)

78.8Ranks 258 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 13.3 (−17%)

9.1Faster than 22% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 39.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+143%)

7.22Ranks 1,870 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports92%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,422 t

8.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

FREDERIK
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FREDERIK
Container median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

FREDERIK
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	−6%	−8%	−19%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2024	−0.2 kn	−26%	−27%	+19%	+16%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.5 kn	+9%	−4%	−26%	+4%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.1 kn	+21%	+44%	+29%	+7%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−5%	−3%	−7%	+15%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−4%	−6%	+3%	−0%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MS "Frederik" Jens u. Waller GmbH & Co. KG	3,932	12,605	48,500	4,418	11.0	81.1	39.6	–
2024	MS "Frederik" Jens u. Waller GmbH & Co. KG	5,177	16,423	60,229	5,354	11.2	86.0	42.4	–
2022	not published	5,914	18,678	50,667	4,453	11.4	117	36.5	–
2021	not published	7,306	23,080	68,146	5,280	12.9	107	35.0	–
2020	not published	4,692	14,809	52,902	4,901	10.8	88.7	32.7	–
2019	not published	5,290	16,814	56,696	5,389	10.5	93.3	28.4	–
2018	not published	5,319	17,054	54,968	5,109	10.8	96.8	28.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS "Frederik" Jens u. Waller GmbH & Co. KG	39.6	16.3	+143%	1,870 of 2,208	EnvService	B
2024	MS "Frederik" Jens u. Waller GmbH & Co. KG	42.4	17.5	+142%	1,652 of 1,974	EnvService	B
2022	not published	36.5	19.1	+91%	1,425 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	35.0	17.9	+95%	1,411 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	32.7	17.6	+86%	1,375 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	28.4	18.9	+50%	1,214 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	28.5	20.2	+41%	1,142 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.