Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

EJNAN

IMO: 9334076
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EIV 12.36 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

340.9 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 230.7 kg/nm (+48%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

13.53

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (+49%)

Average speed

14.9 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

122.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,440 t

CO₂ emitted

27,441 t

Distance sailed

27,692 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,856 h

77 days, 21% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 340.9 kg/nm · median 230.7 (+48%)

166.5Ranks 298 of 355, lowest first358.9

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 14.2 (+5%)

10.7Faster than 68% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 13.53 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+49%)

5.47Ranks 293 of 355, lowest first17.94

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports10%
From the EU38%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

EJNAN
LNG carrier median

200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

EJNAN
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

EJNAN
LNG carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2022→2023	−1.6 kn	−1%	−10%	−52%	−58%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.6 kn	−1%	+9%	+143%	+151%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	−9%	−10%	−9%	−30%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	+6%	−1%	−56%	+34%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	+4%	+5%	−6%	−17%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2023LNG	not published	9,440	27,441	27,692	1,856	14.9	340.9	–	–
2022LNG	not published	19,748	57,721	57,523	3,488	16.5	343.3	–	–
2021LNG	not published	8,252	24,161	23,680	1,588	14.9	348.5	–	–
2020LNG	not published	9,950	28,292	25,948	1,726	15.0	383.4	–	–
2019LNG	not published	21,227	61,170	58,906	3,645	16.2	360.4	–	–
2018LNG	not published	21,586	62,883	62,452	3,903	16.0	345.6	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023LNG	not published	13.53	9.10	+49%	293 of 355	ClassNK	B+C
2022LNG	not published	31.91	10.38	+207%	347 of 379	ClassNK	B+C
2021LNG	not published	12.70	10.46	+21%	194 of 289	ClassNK	B+C
2020LNG	not published	18.04	10.71	+68%	238 of 267	ClassNK	B+C
2019LNG	not published	13.49	10.87	+24%	176 of 248	ClassNK	B+C
2018LNG	not published	16.34	10.92	+50%	172 of 197	ClassNK	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.