Navalyze · Container · Ship

UAFL RACER

IMO: 9334818
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 9,921 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.38 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: HANSA MARBURG, OKEE ALICIA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Okee Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,902 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

115

Container median 182 kg/nm (−37%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

36.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+79%)

Average speed

8.9 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−36%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,631 t

CO₂ emitted

11,345 t

Distance sailed

31,571 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,548 h

148 days, 41% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 108 kg/nm · median 177 (−39%)

78.8Ranks 609 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 13.3 (−17%)

9.1Faster than 23% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 34.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+109%)

7.22Ranks 1,769 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU43%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

938 t

8.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

UAFL RACER
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

UAFL RACER
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

UAFL RACER
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−4.0 kn	−5%	−30%	+214%	−41%	4.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.6 kn	+6%	+27%	−16%	+108%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−4%	+1%	−79%	+8%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	+7%	+13%	−6%	+7%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	+10%	+6%	−4%	+0%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.3 kn	−14%	−3%	+37%	−27%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.6 kn	−5%	+12%	+37%	−10%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Okee Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	3,185	9,964	29,479	2,662	11.1	108	34.1	–
2024	Okee Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	1,061	3,317	9,377	623	15.1	113	57.7	–
2023	not published	1,188	3,721	11,107	886	12.5	107	27.8	–
2022	not published	5,991	18,732	53,637	4,499	11.9	112	25.6	–
2021	not published	5,938	18,554	57,017	5,040	11.3	104	23.9	–
2020	not published	5,602	17,502	59,151	5,009	11.8	94.7	23.9	–
2019	not published	4,725	14,751	43,132	4,113	10.5	110	32.5	–
2018	not published	3,631	11,345	31,571	3,548	8.9	115	36.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Okee Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	34.1	16.3	+109%	1,769 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	Okee Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	57.7	17.5	+229%	1,838 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	27.8	19.4	+43%	1,282 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	25.6	19.1	+34%	1,164 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	23.9	17.9	+34%	1,156 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	23.9	17.6	+36%	1,181 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	32.5	18.9	+72%	1,311 of 1,788	DNV	–
2018	not published	36.3	20.2	+79%	1,279 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.