Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

MILOU

IMO
9335123
Type
Chemical tanker
Port of registry
Nassau
Technical efficiency
EIV 6.76 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
GULF MOON

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ALBERTA SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.

?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
–
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
–
g CO₂/t·nm
Average speed
–
Fuel per day at sea
–
Fuel consumed
0 t
CO₂ emitted
0 t
0 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
–
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
0 h
0 days, 0% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,314 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 94.7 kg/nm · median 81.9 (+16%)
55.0Ranks 913 of 1,314, lowest first114.9
Average speedThis ship 11.9 kn · median 11.2 (+6%)
9.1Faster than 71% of chemical tanker ships12.7
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.34 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.23 (−24%)
9.07Ranks 377 of 1,314, lowest first43.80
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

The voyage split is not in this year's report.

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
–
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • MILOU
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • MILOU
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MILOU
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2023→2025–––––
2022→2023+3.9 kn−6%+41%−9%−20%3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2022−3.6 kn+9%−25%+77%+12%3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019–––––

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025ALBERTA SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.00–0––––
2023not published1,2974,09213,7001,15311.994.712.34–
2022not published1,5064,71515,0011,8838.0100.415.48–
2019not published7792,4298,47173111.691.913.81–
2018not published00–0––––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025ALBERTA SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.––––Lloyd's RegisterA
2023not published12.3416.23−24%377 of 1,314Lloyd's Register–
2022not published15.4816.06−4%658 of 1,409Lloyd's RegisterA+B+C
2019not published13.8117.32−20%431 of 1,321VerifaviaC
2018not published––––VerifaviaC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

MILOU (IMO 9335123): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze